In line with the Mass Python 2 Package Removal [0], the following (sub)packages of python-pycryptodomex were marked for removal: * python2-pycryptodomex According to our query, those (sub)packages only provide a Python 2 importable module. If this is not true, please tell us why, so we can fix our query. Please remove them from your package in Rawhide (Fedora 32). Please don't remove packages from Fedora 31, it is past Beta Freeze. Please don't do this for Fedora 30/29 either, removing packages from a released Fedora branch is forbidden. As said in the change document, if there is no objection in a week, we will remove the package(s) as soon as we get to it. This change might not match your packaging style, so we'd prefer if you did the change. If you need more time, please let us know here. If you do the change yourself, it would help us a lot by reducing the amount of packages we need to mass change. We hope this doesn't come to you as a surprise. If you want to know our motivation for this, please read the change document [0]. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F31_Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal
I suggest to wait with this, see https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2247#comment-604664
python-volatility started to depend on this. Mohamed, please reply in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2247
Hi Mohamed, I would like to get python-dns switched from pycrypto to pycryptodomex (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-dns/pull-request/1) and also to retain the Python 2 version of python-dns, which is needed by my package trac-spamfilter-plugin, until such time as trac is ported to Python 3. Would you be OK to keep the Python 2 build of pycryptodomex around?
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #3) > Hi Mohamed, I would like to get python-dns switched from pycrypto to > pycryptodomex (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-dns/pull-request/1) > and also to retain the Python 2 version of python-dns, which is needed by my > package trac-spamfilter-plugin, until such time as trac is ported to Python > 3. Would you be OK to keep the Python 2 build of pycryptodomex around? Sure, I will keep the Python 2 subpackage as long as its needed.
Great, thanks.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle. Changing version to 32.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1785783 ***