Bug 1761715 - [sig-api-machinery] ResourceQuota should create a ResourceQuota and capture the life of a secret. [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
Summary: [sig-api-machinery] ResourceQuota should create a ResourceQuota and capture t...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1819849
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kube-apiserver
Version: 4.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.4.0
Assignee: Lukasz Szaszkiewicz
QA Contact: Xingxing Xia
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1765704 1768010 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-10-15 06:54 UTC by xiyuan
Modified: 2020-04-08 07:27 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-08 07:27:06 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description xiyuan 2019-10-15 06:54:42 UTC
Description of problem:
https://prow.svc.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-gcp-4.2/51
fail [k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/apimachinery/resource_quota.go:144]: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc000287400>: {
        s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
    }
    timed out waiting for the condition
occurred

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.2 jobs

Comment 1 Ben Parees 2019-11-01 20:54:18 UTC
dupe of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765704 ?

Comment 2 Michal Fojtik 2019-11-06 19:36:09 UTC
*** Bug 1768010 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Michal Fojtik 2019-11-06 19:36:17 UTC
*** Bug 1765704 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Lukasz Szaszkiewicz 2020-02-13 14:14:54 UTC
The first test case (from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768010) timed out on "Counting existing ResourceQuota" step.
The step simply tried to get a ResourceQuota object in a namespace, it gave up after 30 seconds. I suspected a network glitch. I checked the audit logs
but I didn’t find a single request to “e2e-resourcequota-9242” namespace which is weird. 

The second test case (https://prow.svc.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-aws-mirrors-4.3/140) failed because the expected number of secrets didn’t match the actual in a ResourceQuota object (expected 3, actual 7). The number of expected secrets is calculated at the beginning of the test and basically boils down to looping until the number of secrets stabilizes for 5 seconds.
As of today (1.17.1) the default number of secrets in a new namespace is 10. This particular test case run on v1.16.0-beta.2+04f4dcb

The third test case (https://prow.svc.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-gcp-4.2/51) failed on the same step as the second one only the actual values
are different (expected 6, actual 9) and the version of the API server (v1.14.6)

Comment 6 Daneyon Hansen 2020-04-07 23:10:45 UTC
Reopening since this test is consistently failing across multiple CI jobs. See [1] for additional detail.

[1] https://search.svc.ci.openshift.org/?search=ResourceQuota+should+create+a+ResourceQuota+and+capture+the+life+of+a+secret&maxAge=48h&context=2&type=bug%2Bjunit

Comment 7 Lukasz Szaszkiewicz 2020-04-08 07:27:06 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1819849 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.