Description of problem: Tested evolution calendar with scim and noticed that the pre-edit buffer is not reset when scim is activated in another time slot (input context). As a result, previous entries gets replicated. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): evolution-data-server-1.5.2-1.1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.start evolution -> calendar 2.in day view, click on 1PM 3.enter a to get focus 4.ctrl-space to activate scim 5.enter 'aka' 6.click on the next time slot and enter a 7.ctrl space to activate scim and enter genki Actual results: ããããã Expected results: ããã Additional info:
Created attachment 122514 [details] evolution calendar with scim
I will try the upstream version and submit a bug upstream if necessary.
evolution-2.8.0-5.fc6 Bug still exist in FC6T3. Tested with the following components: ========================= evolution-data-server-1.8.0-9.fc6 evolution-sharp-0.11.1-8 beagle-evolution-0.2.9-1.fc6 evolution-webcal-2.7.1-6 evolution-data-server-devel-1.8.0-9.fc6 scim-1.4.4-34.fc6 scim-tables-0.5.6-7 scim-chewing-0.3.1-4.fc6 scim-bridge-gtk-0.4.5-2.fc6 scim-qtimm-0.9.4-5 scim-bridge-0.4.5-1.fc6 scim-pinyin-0.5.91-12.fc6 scim-sinhala-0.2.0-1.fc6 scim-tables-chinese-0.5.6-7 scim-m17n-0.2.0-6.fc6 scim-libs-1.4.4-34.fc6 scim-hangul-0.2.2-7.fc6
Created attachment 140446 [details] patch for the problem.
Oops, sorry Matthew for moving to modified...
Patch applied to evolution-2.9.1-3.fc7.
Thanks :)
Created attachment 144088 [details] Latest patch
Based on Comment 8, moving to assigned again. Matthew, can you please update the patch for this bug when discussion in Bug 209566 ends. Thanks, Mayank
Patch in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209566#c38 has a working patch for this problem. Matthew, can you please set this bug to MODIFIED if this patch is already in Rawhide? Thanks.
Lawrence, can you still reproduce this bug on Fedora 7 or Rawhide? I can't reproduce the problem with Evolution 2.11.90, but I'm not sure what the correct behavior is supposed to be.
yes, I m not able to reproduce problem with following version: evolution-2.11.90-4.fc8