Bug 1778411 - Non-responsive maintainer check for jhogarth
Summary: Non-responsive maintainer check for jhogarth
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-pyrfc3339
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: James Hogarth
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1774667
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-11-30 19:38 UTC by Felix Schwarz
Modified: 2019-12-04 22:00 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-12-04 21:23:46 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Felix Schwarz 2019-11-30 19:38:37 UTC
This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for <fas-id>, following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/.

Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain python-pyrfc3339.

- bug 1697425 is open since 2019-04-08 (almost 8 months)
- pull request 2 open since 2019-10-08 (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyrfc3339/pull-request/2)

Comment 1 Felix Schwarz 2019-11-30 19:39:40 UTC
PS: If necessary I can take over this package (mostly to get #1774667 fixed)

Comment 2 Itamar Reis Peixoto 2019-12-04 21:05:18 UTC
(In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #1)

fixed on rawhide,

Comment 3 Felix Schwarz 2019-12-04 21:22:19 UTC
I think this bug should stay open because there is still no response from James (and he has a lot of other packages which likely need some love). He announced ~2 months ago that he won't have much time in the future for Fedora so the non-responsive maintainer process is likely the best option here.

(Though I really appreciate your commits on pyrfc3339.)

Comment 4 James Hogarth 2019-12-04 21:23:28 UTC
(In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #3)
> I think this bug should stay open because there is still no response from
> James (and he has a lot of other packages which likely need some love). He
> announced ~2 months ago that he won't have much time in the future for
> Fedora so the non-responsive maintainer process is likely the best option
> here.
> 
> (Though I really appreciate your commits on pyrfc3339.)

Apologies ... I missed this one where I had thought I'd given commit rights already to someone.

Comment 5 Felix Schwarz 2019-12-04 22:00:17 UTC
Thank you :-)

Would you mind giving certbot-sig commit access for pyrfc3339 ?
At a quick glance it seems as if only certbot needs it and it is pretty convenient being able to update the whole stack.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.