Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1785491

Summary: Update cpp-hocon package to most recent version.
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Summer Long <slong>
Component: cpp-hoconAssignee: Miguel Garcia <mgarciac>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Lon Hohberger <lhh>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 16.2 (Train)CC: amoralej, jjoyce, jschluet, lhh, stchen
Target Milestone: z3Keywords: Reopened, Security, Triaged, ZStream
Target Release: 16.2 (Train on RHEL 8.4)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: cpp-hocon-0.3.0-4.1.el8ost facter-3.9.3-15.el8ost puppet-5.5.10-13.el8ost Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-06-22 16:02:30 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2036847    
Bug Blocks: 1770625, 2036842    

Description Summer Long 2019-12-20 02:31:40 UTC 
Description of problem:
Upstream version is already up to 2.1, but cpp-hocon was recently added to RHOSP using the older versions:
15/16: cpp-hocon-0.1.8-2.el8ost
13/14: cpp-hocon-0.1.6-9.el7ost

As a hardening measure, new packages should be added using the most recent version.

Actual results
All current RHOSP versions are using older cpp-hocon version.

Expected results:
cpp-hocon-2.1 package should be used in at least 15/16.
Comment 2 Summer Long 2019-12-23 21:56:33 UTC 
Well, it's a hardening measure so up to you, but if the effort isn't over the top, yes.
Comment 3 Summer Long 2019-12-23 22:05:13 UTC 
In the future with issues like this (and we are starting to do more reviews), do you need us to raise separate bugs? One for package updates and one for its side effects?
Comment 4 Lon Hohberger 2020-01-02 13:49:15 UTC 
I think it could be case-by-case, and we can probably handle cloning them on our end if required.

In this case, there's only a few packages that utilize this, so the effort is minor - mostly ensuring we don't miss something.
Comment 5 Alfredo Moralejo 2020-01-27 14:02:59 UTC 
FYI, we've successfully built 0.2.1 in cbs for centos8
Comment 6 stchen 2020-09-30 19:26:34 UTC 
Closing EOL, OSP 15 has been retired as of Sept 19
Comment 7 Summer Long 2021-09-21 03:52:15 UTC 
Just saw that this was closed EOL for 15, but 16.1 and 16.2 are alive and still using the older version. 
16.1= 	cpp-hocon-0.1.8-2.el8ost
16.2=   cpp-hocon-0.1.8-3.el8ost

Reopening for the consideration of the 16 versions. Have set this to 16.2, let me know if a 16.1 tracker should be created as well.
Comment 24 errata-xmlrpc 2022-06-22 16:02:30 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Release of components for Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2.3 (Train)), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:4793