Description of problem: SLAVE positional argument doesn't provide a clear picture of what it is when compared to mastervol and slavevol in schedule_georep.py.in. It would be better if we change it to something like "Slave hostame (<username>@SLAVEHOST or SLAVEHOST)" Present: ---------- positional arguments: mastervol Master Volume Name SLAVE SLAVEHOST or root@SLAVEHOST or user@SLAVEHOST slavevol Slave Volume Name Suggested: ----------- positional arguments: mastervol Master Volume Name SLAVE Slave hostname (<username>@SLAVEHOST or SLAVEHOST) slavevol Slave Volume Name Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Whatever it the latest How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/23919 ([geo-rep] Improving help message in schedule_georep.py.in) posted (#1) for review on master by Kshithij Iyer
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/23919 ([geo-rep] Improving help message in schedule_georep.py.in) merged (#5) on master by Kshithij Iyer