Bug 1786276 - [geo-rep] Help for positional argument SLAVE in schedule_georep.py.in isn't clear.
Summary: [geo-rep] Help for positional argument SLAVE in schedule_georep.py.in isn't c...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: geo-replication
Version: mainline
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kshithij Iyer
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1787994
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-12-24 07:28 UTC by Kshithij Iyer
Modified: 2020-01-06 04:32 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1787994 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-01-06 04:06:56 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Gluster.org Gerrit 23919 0 None Merged [geo-rep] Improving help message in schedule_georep.py.in 2020-01-06 04:06:55 UTC

Description Kshithij Iyer 2019-12-24 07:28:36 UTC
Description of problem:
SLAVE positional argument doesn't provide a clear picture of what it is when compared to mastervol and slavevol in schedule_georep.py.in. It would be better if we change it to something like "Slave hostame (<username>@SLAVEHOST or SLAVEHOST)"

Present:
----------
positional arguments:
  mastervol            Master Volume Name
  SLAVE                SLAVEHOST or root@SLAVEHOST or user@SLAVEHOST 
  slavevol             Slave Volume Name


Suggested:
-----------
positional arguments:
  mastervol            Master Volume Name
  SLAVE                Slave hostname (<username>@SLAVEHOST or SLAVEHOST)
  slavevol             Slave Volume Name


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Whatever it the latest

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2019-12-24 07:38:05 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/23919 ([geo-rep] Improving help message in schedule_georep.py.in) posted (#1) for review on master by Kshithij Iyer

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2020-01-06 04:06:56 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/23919 ([geo-rep] Improving help message in schedule_georep.py.in) merged (#5) on master by Kshithij Iyer


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.