+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1786276 +++ Description of problem: SLAVE positional argument doesn't provide a clear picture of what it is when compared to mastervol and slavevol in schedule_georep.py.in. It would be better if we change it to something like "Slave hostame (<username>@SLAVEHOST or SLAVEHOST)" Present: ---------- positional arguments: mastervol Master Volume Name SLAVE SLAVEHOST or root@SLAVEHOST or user@SLAVEHOST slavevol Slave Volume Name Suggested: ----------- positional arguments: mastervol Master Volume Name SLAVE Slave hostname (<username>@SLAVEHOST or SLAVEHOST) slavevol Slave Volume Name Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Whatever it the latest How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: --- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2019-12-24 07:38:05 UTC --- REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/23919 ([geo-rep] Improving help message in schedule_georep.py.in) posted (#1) for review on master by Kshithij Iyer --- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2020-01-06 04:06:56 UTC --- REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/23919 ([geo-rep] Improving help message in schedule_georep.py.in) merged (#5) on master by Kshithij Iyer
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (glusterfs bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5603