Document URL: [1] - https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.2/nodes/nodes/nodes-nodes-audit-log.html#nodes-nodes-audit-log-basic-config_nodes-nodes-audit-log Section Number and Name: Describe the issue: configuring log levels in APIServer resource as per [1] is a document bug as it does not at all change log levels for API. In CRD definition we could see that it is for kubeapiserver and openshiftapiserver. ~~~ $ oc explain apiserver.spec | grep -i loglevel $ $ oc explain kubeapiserver.spec | grep -i loglevel logLevel <string> logLevel is an intent based logging for an overall component. It does not operatorLogLevel <string> operatorLogLevel is an intent based logging for the operator itself. It $ $ oc explain openshiftapiserver.spec | grep -i loglevel logLevel <string> logLevel is an intent based logging for an overall component. It does not operatorLogLevel <string> operatorLogLevel is an intent based logging for the operator itself. It $ ~~~ Suggestions for improvement: Documentation should reflect properly Additional information:
Arnab -- Thank you for filing this BZ. Is the request to remove the "Configuring the API Audit Log level" [1] from the docs until the RFE mentioned in the customer case is implemented? If so, please see: Docs PR: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/19721 Preview available at: https://bz-1791888--ocpdocs.netlify.com/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/nodes/nodes-nodes-audit-log.html Michael [1] https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.2/nodes/nodes/nodes-nodes-audit-log.html#nodes-nodes-audit-log-basic-config_nodes-nodes-audit-log
Hi Mike, Mike: Is the request to remove the "Configuring the API Audit Log level" [1] from the docs until the RFE mentioned in the customer case is implemented? Arnab: Yes, the RFE is not assigned yet. Mike: If so, please see: Docs PR: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/19721 Arnab: I see you have removed 'Configuring the API Audit Log level'. However I was expecting this part of the document to be modified with correct steps required to perform the same. Regards Arnab
Moving this bug to VERIFIED due to the doc PR LGTM.
Using bug 1816115 to separately check another topic of this bug.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0936
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days