Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Ever since the last big revamp of the login screen about 2-3 weeks ago the second screen on my system (using NVidia's proprietary driver because nv does not have twinview support) leaves the second screen black. This wasn't the case before. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gdm-2.13.0.7-1 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.get nvidia card with twinview support (mine is Quadro FX 330) 2.start system at runlevel 5 3. Actual results: second screen black Expected results: background (at least) should be on both screens Additional info: xdpyinfo shows the two screens as one big one screen #0: print screen: no dimensions: 3200x1200 pixels (821x311 millimeters) resolution: 99x98 dots per inch depths (7): 16, 1, 4, 8, 15, 24, 32 root window id: 0x5c depth of root window: 16 planes In /etc/X11/xorg.conf one specifies it like this: Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Videocard0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 16 Option "TwinView" "yes" Option "TwinViewOrientation" "RightOf" Option "MetaModes" "1600x1200,1600x1200"
Hi, Recently we changed from making the default background color be blue to black. I'm wondering if that's what you're seeing here? If you move your mouse to the black screen can you see a cursor?
What I see is that one screen has the blue background and gdm graphics and the other one is black. The mouse pointer is visible at either one. One strange thing: when the mouse is on the black screen the gdm input widget does not have focus. That by itself is highly annoying because it means I always have to use the mouse and move it into the screen with the input field because somehow it is by default in the midel but just in the black screen.
GDM currently only uses one head in multihead setups. The question is what do we do with the other head? Before the theme redesign we just painted it blue. This worked okay because the theme itself was blue. The new theme has a brushed metal gradient, so painting the other head blue breaks the continuity and previously confused some users. Thos users assumed something would eventually load in the blank blue head. Recently, we changed it from blue to black. The rationale being that we aren't using the head so let's make it look inactive. What you're seeing (one screen black and one screen active) is by design. It's obviously confused you, so the design might need some rethinking. I'm not entirely sure what the correct behavior should be, however. We don't want to stretch the login screen over all the heads. That would look horrible, and probably break a lot of 3rd party themes. I think maybe we should just put the brushed metal background up on the second head so it seems more like an extension of the theme. Or maybe we should put some sort of explanatory text saying to log in using the main head? Maybe a big arrow pointing to the right head with the text "Login here -->"?
The new behavior is defintely rritation because it's different from the old behavior. And I'm certainly not the worst critic when it comes to this. Less technical people are even less inclined to accept change (ask my wife). The old behavior probably wasn't perfect. But it at least showed the second screen was recognized properly. I always though why not present the information on both screen. Maybe even magically fill in the information entered into the field on the one screen into the edit field on the other screen. Then it wouldn't matter which screen is used and where the mouse cursor happens to be. Alternatively using the brushed background is certainly much better than the current behavior.
Hi, While cloning may give a more consistent experience to the user (because before X starts the console is cloned), I think it would be hard to get right. We can't turn on real cloning after the X server has started, so we would have to emulate it by proxying key events, clicks, and presenting a fake second mouse cursor, etc. It would also be inconsistent if the heads had different resolutions. We might be able to get most of the way there by making the greeter model-view or something along those lines, but all in all it would be a pretty significant engineering effort. It would definitely take more resources to do than value added over the alternative you mention--putting the brushed gradient background up. So, I think we should just do that.
I agree with this, it's a lot of work. I'm not sure it's necessary to mimic the mouse cursor the same way (just one would be fine). Anyway, for the solution of painting the theme on the second screen: the keyboard focus is still a problem. I really would prefer to not having to use the mouse before I type in the user ID and password. But with the current setup the mouse cursor for me ends up on the second, black screen and the input line does not have focus. Couldn't at least this be fixed?
So the problem is that there is no window manager running. This means that windows only get focus when the mouse is over them. It should be fixable though. Can you file a separate bug report and add it to the FC5Target tracker? Thanks.
For the record, the issue mentioned in comment 6 (and the second paragraph of comment 2) has been entered as bug 180085.
Ray, can't you just set the keyboard focus to the greeter window explicitly ?
Matthias, yes we should be able to do that.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Fedora 8 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-01-07. Fedora 8 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.