Bug 181289 - openssl-devel.i386 missing from x86-64 distribution
openssl-devel.i386 missing from x86-64 distribution
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: comps (Show other bugs)
x86_64 Linux
medium Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: David Cantrell
: 181291 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: FC6Blocker
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-02-12 16:56 EST by H. Peter Anvin
Modified: 2013-01-09 20:21 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-06-21 16:58:19 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description H. Peter Anvin 2006-02-12 16:56:45 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.0.7-1.1.fc4 Firefox/1.0.7

Description of problem:
openssl-devel.i386 is missing from the x86-64 distribution.  It makes it impossible to build 32-bit applications which require any of the openssl libraries on a 64-bit machine.

Installed from a 32-bit distribution it works fine, so it only needs to be added to the 64-bit distribution (so updating works.)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Try to build an openssl-using application, e.g. git, as a 32-bit application on an x86-64 system

Additional info:
Comment 1 H. Peter Anvin 2006-02-12 22:41:34 EST
*** Bug 181291 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Tomas Mraz 2006-02-13 02:44:34 EST
Comment 3 Rahul Sundaram 2006-02-20 06:07:52 EST

These bugs are being closed since a large number of updates have been released
after the FC5 test1 and test2 releases. Kindly update your system by running yum
update as root user or try out the third and final test version of FC5 being
released in a short while and verify if the bugs are still present on the system
.Reopen or file new bug reports as appropriate after confirming the presence of
this issue. Thanks
Comment 4 Tomas Mraz 2006-02-20 06:43:24 EST
This bug is definitely not fixed yet.
Comment 5 Warren Togami 2006-03-06 10:51:08 EST
Is it really clear that we want this?  It is trivially easy to create a chroot
with an easy automated tool like mock to build 32bit binaries for use elsewhere.
Comment 6 Warren Togami 2006-03-06 10:53:47 EST
Even if this is desirable, openssl headers are not arch clean, so this would
cause conflicts if we did it now.  Moving to FC6 for now.
Comment 7 Tomas Mraz 2006-03-06 11:03:28 EST
They actually are arch clean.
Comment 8 Warren Togami 2006-03-06 11:09:20 EST
OK, but we have no time left to do this in FC5.  We have too many other last
minute changes to make of higher priority.
Comment 9 Jesse Keating 2006-04-19 16:16:12 EDT
This requires some core changes to how multi-lib is figured out and evaulated. 
Deferring until such time.
Comment 10 Trond Eivind Glomsrød 2006-04-26 06:43:48 EDT
This is a problem for RHEL4 as well....
Comment 11 Jesse Keating 2006-06-21 16:58:19 EDT
This has been fixed in FC6 Test1.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.