Bug 1838685 (OCPRHV-101) - OCPRHV-101: Improve ~/.ovirt/ovirt-config.yaml
Summary: OCPRHV-101: Improve ~/.ovirt/ovirt-config.yaml
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: OCPRHV-101
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Installer
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.8.0
Assignee: Peter Lauterbach
QA Contact: Lucie Leistnerova
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: OCPRHV-208 OCPRHV-209
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-05-21 15:08 UTC by Douglas Schilling Landgraf
Modified: 2023-09-15 00:32 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-03-30 14:15:46 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 2 Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2020-05-22 12:46:48 UTC 
It's weekend on TLV side of the world. I will work to propose a solution today.
Comment 9 Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2020-07-09 12:10:45 UTC 
due to capacity constraints we will be revisiting this bug in the upcoming sprint
Comment 10 Rolfe Dlugy-Hegwer 2020-07-10 13:21:01 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1851901 ***
Comment 11 Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2020-07-10 20:00:48 UTC 
(In reply to Rolfe Dlugy-Hegwer from comment #10)
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1851901 ***

Hey Rolfe, I think this is not duplicate of bz#1851901. IMHO, we need to describe in our docs that this file exists and the fields inside.
Comment 12 Sandro Bonazzola 2020-09-14 09:45:32 UTC 
Same as comment #9
Comment 13 Sandro Bonazzola 2020-10-22 11:38:03 UTC 
due to capacity constraints we will be revisiting this bug in the upcoming sprint
Comment 14 Sandro Bonazzola 2020-12-03 12:35:46 UTC 
Need to be done along sith other related bugs.
Comment 15 Gal Zaidman 2021-01-21 08:58:08 UTC 
due to capacity constraints we will be pushin this bug in the next release
Comment 17 Janos Bonic 2021-02-25 12:16:57 UTC 
@peter.lauterbach do you have any updates on this?

On my end I think that we should check the permissions on the file and that's all we can do without requiring the customer to have a larger credential infrastructure.
Comment 18 Janos Bonic 2021-03-03 13:46:19 UTC 
@peter.lauterbach I checked the code and we are saving this with in 0600 mode, so I think this is a WONTFIX since we can't ask the customer to provide us with a secure enclave for credential storage.
Comment 20 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 00:32:00 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.