Hide Forgot
Hello, i have packaged paco 1.10.3 Spec Name or Url: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/paco/paco.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/paco/paco-1.10.3-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Paco is a simple yet powerful tool to aid package management when installing programs from source code. It uses the LD_PRELOAD method to track package installations, and provides various options to keep the installed software organized.
1) Replace paco-1.10.3.tar.bz2 with %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 in Source0 2) I think you need Requires: gtk+-2.0 and BuildRequires: gtk+-2.0-devel, as your current Requires and BuildRequires pull in version 1.0, and building fails: checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.6.0... Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gtk+-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'gtk+-2.0' found configure: error: Library requirements (gtk+-2.0 >= 2.6.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.25915 (%build)
(In reply to comment #1) > 2) I think you need Requires: gtk+-2.0 and BuildRequires: gtk+-2.0-devel, as > your current Requires and BuildRequires pull in version 1.0, and building fails: > > checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.6.0... Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the > pkg-config search path. That should be: BuildRequires: gtk2-devel >= 2.6.0 There's no need to add a Requires: because rpm's autodependency generator will pick up the shared library deps itself.
I've removed the buildrequires depends and remotified spec file. Spec Url : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/paco/paco.spec SRPMS Url : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/paco/paco-1.10.3-1.fc5.src.rpm
NEEDSWORK * Take a look at rpm -qlpv paco-1.10.3-1.i386.rpm and notice that it includes several filesystem directories, which it must not include, e.g. drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/pkgconfig drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/applications drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/locale drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/locale/ca drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/locale/fr drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/locale/ru drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/locale/sr drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/man drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/man/man5 drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/man/man8 drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pixmaps Additionally, it must not include the files of the paco-debuginfo package, which is generated automatically: drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/debug drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/debug/usr drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib * The included pkgconfig file is questionable, since it doesn't include anything really useful/helpful. * Package installs shared libraries into %_libdir, but doesn't run /sbin/ldconfig in %post/%postun scriptlets. * The included *.so library should not be included. * Package must not include static archives (*.a), especially not when there's no API for them. * Package should not include libtool archives (*.la) unless these are really required at run-time. * Package must include the licence file "COPYING" as %doc. * Package should include the files "AUTHORS" and "BUGS" as %doc. * Configuration file ought to be marked as such using %config(noreplace). * Locale message object files must be included with the %find_lang macro and not by including everything below %_datadir. * Desktop menu file could need some love: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * Run-time issues: Desktop menu entry for gpaco doesn't start anything. In terminal, I get: $ gpaco gpaco: /var/log/paco: No such file or directory
Hi! I've packaged paco 2.0.9 and I've taken the complaints and suggestions here into account while doing so. I wasn't sure if to create a new issue or to comment on this one, though. But without further ado, here's my spec and SRPM files: Spec: http://rojekti.fi/files/paco/paco.spec SRPM: http://rojekti.fi/files/paco/paco-2.0.9-1.fc14.src.rpm This is also my first package and I need a sponsor.
Hello, Open a new one for more clarity, it's better. I'll close my request as duplicate of your :-) Damien
Hi! I've created a new request at bug 705043. Thanks!
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 705043 ***