Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1851532

Summary:	BMO can get into hot reconcile loop when changing Status
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	Zane Bitter <zbitter>
Component:	Bare Metal Hardware Provisioning	Assignee:	Zane Bitter <zbitter>
Bare Metal Hardware Provisioning sub component:	baremetal-operator	QA Contact:	Raviv Bar-Tal <rbartal>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	Docs Contact:
Severity:	high
Priority:	unspecified	CC:	augol, beth.white, shardy
Version:	4.4	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	4.4.z
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1851531	Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-11-12 14:54:17 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1851531
Bug Blocks:

Description Zane Bitter 2020-06-26 20:37:06 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1851531 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1851530 +++

Description of problem:
As described in: https://github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pull/565

The code to write the 'status' annotation (an annotation containing the Status data) whenever the status changes can cause an infinite hot loop. Since the annotation and the Status subresource cannot be written at the same time, we re-read the object after writing the annotation and before trying to write the Status. However, if we get a previously cached version then there will be an error and we'll begin the Reconcile cycle again. The new Status changes generated by this new Reconcile may contain different timestamps, which will result in the annotation being updated and the whole cycle repeating. Rate limiting helps to ensure that once this happens once the timestamps only get further and further apart, so the loop is self-sustaining.

We don't actually need or want to write a status annotation. We want to be able to *read* one, and we backported the code to do so to both 4.5 (bug 1835457) and 4.4 (bug 1843230). However, the code to both read and create the annotation was in the same patch, so we ended up with both.

Comment 2 Zane Bitter 2020-11-12 14:47:31 UTC

Not required in 4.4.