Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Setting up a fax capable device (HP Color LaserJet 2840 in this case) using hp-setup causes an error. Looking at the spec (http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/hplip/FC-5/hplip.spec?rev=1.52&view=auto) it appears that the removal of the Fax files was intentional: # Don't package hpfax yet. rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/cups/backend/hpfax rm -f %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/cups/model/HP-Fax* However, I don't believe that this is sufficient. Unless I'm mistaken, you also need to edit models.xml and change <fax type="1"/> to <fax type="0"/> for each fax capable printer or it will look for the fax PPD file and print an error. Also, what about /usr/bin/hp-sendfax? How useful is that if faxing is disabled. It gives errors as well (because there is no fax queue). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): hplip-0.9.8-6 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. hp-setup a fax capable device 2. hp-sendfax 3. Actual results: This is the last portion of the printer setup: FAX QUEUE SETUP Please enter a name for this fax queue (m=use model name:'HP_Color_LaserJet_2840_fax'*, q=quit) ? Using queue name: HP_Color_LaserJet_2840_fax [ERROR]: Unable to find HP fax PPD file! Please check you HPLIP installation and try again. Expected results: No error or even better, a working fax device. Additional info:
Actually, upon further inspection, there is a /usr/share/hplip/fax/ppd/HP-Fax-hplip.ppd file, however, hp-setup is looking in /usr/share/foomatic/db/source/PPD/HP/color_laser/ for the file. This can be confirmed by copying the ppd file and running hp-setup.
How about with the test update? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2006-March/msg01594.html
No, same problem. Also, rawhide has the same problem (as you probably expected by this point)
Is this a clue that there should be a symlink from /usr/share/foomatic/db/source/PPD/HP/color_laserjet/HP-Fax-lplip.ppd to /usr/share/hplip/fax/ppd/HP-Fax-hplip.ppd ?? http://hpinkjet.sourceforge.net/updates.php#rel099 22. HPLIP now installs HP-Fax-hplip.ppd independent of HPIJS. HPLIP installs HP-Fax-hplip.ppd into $(datadir)/HP directory, but HPIJS creates the symlink from cups/model/foomatic-ppd to $(datadir)/HP.
It seems the config file points to a non-existant directory. This change allows the ppd for the fax to be found and the fax queue to be setup: --- hplip.conf.orig 2006-03-24 10:37:14.000000000 -0700 +++ hplip.conf 2006-04-14 01:34:41.000000000 -0600 @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ [dirs] home=/usr/share/hplip run=/var/run -ppd=/usr/share/ppd/HP +ppd=/usr/share/hplip/fax/ppd # Following values are determined at configure time and cannot be changed. [configure]
Sorry, I didn't notice there was a new rpm in updates-testing. I installed hplip-0.9.10-1.2 and I see now that you've moved the ppds to match the path in the hplip.conf file. Now my FC-5 system has the same problem (bugzilla #189024) as my rawhide system.
*** Bug 189024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Tim, I think this all boils down to the PPD files must all reside in some central location, be that the foomatic directory, or a /usr/share/ppd directory. Since the hplip file now only points to the /usr/share/ppd directory that contains the HP-Fax ppd file, that is all that can be found (which was why I filed #189024). If I change the path in my hplip.conf to point to usr/share/foomatic/db/source/PPD directory, and then symbolically link my HP-Fax ppd file to somewhere in that structure (I used /usr/share/foomatic/db/source/PPD/HP/all_in_one), then everything works great and both ppd files are found as they should be.
Okay, let's try hplip-0.9.10-1.3.
[bjohnson@localhost ~]$ rpm -q hplip hplip-0.9.10-1.3 [bjohnson@localhost ~]$ rpm -ql hplip | grep Fax /usr/share/hplip/fax/ppd/HP-Fax-hplip.ppd [bjohnson@localhost ~]$
It's in the hpijs package.
I thought I had looked there too, but I was mistaken. Anyway, I cleared all my cups queues, ran hp-setup, and added both a printer and a fax with no problem whatsoever. Cake. Thanks.