Bug 187481 - [or_IN]About the blwm
Summary: [or_IN]About the blwm
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: fonts-indic
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Rahul Bhalerao
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 206581
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-03-31 09:41 UTC by subhransu behera
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-04-27 11:57:26 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
This is how the combination should look like (51.33 KB, image/tiff)
2006-03-31 09:41 UTC, subhransu behera
no flags Details
Verified Image (2.53 KB, image/png)
2007-04-27 11:55 UTC, A S Alam
no flags Details

Description subhransu behera 2006-03-31 09:41:51 UTC
Description of problem: Problem in Below-base mark positioning (blwm)


How reproducible:

While typing in yudit (with it's inbulid inscript key map) the following
combination is not properly displayed.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Type the U+0b38 U+0b4d U+0b2e U+0b4d U+0b30 U+0b09 in yudit
  
Actual results:

Combination with overlapping characters

Expected results:

Clear view of the combination

Comment 1 subhransu behera 2006-03-31 09:41:51 UTC
Created attachment 127116 [details]
This is how the combination should look like

Comment 2 Leon Ho 2006-08-28 06:50:45 UTC
Does it work in gedit, evolution etc?

Comment 3 subhransu behera 2006-08-28 12:35:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Does it work in gedit, evolution etc?

Hi Leon 

It doesn't work with gedit or evolution !

I had tested it earlier with utkal font which gave me this combination. But for
our Lohit font the rule is not correctly defined. I have also filed a bug for
the missing glyph for this combination.

Reference Bug ID # 194066

Combination is in list no # 18

Comment 5 Rahul Bhalerao 2006-09-14 10:47:47 UTC
The combination reported is here is wrong. The correct combination is:

   (Consonant + U0D4D + Consonant) + U0D43

Here the part which is inside bracket forms a conjunct with below base form. 
Thus when below base mark U0D43 follows, it overlaps the eairlier below base.
This is a GPOS problem. Below base anchor point pair needs to be deined for 
U0D43 and all the other below base glyphs.

Comment 6 Rahul Bhalerao 2006-09-18 07:32:55 UTC
In above comment U0D4D and U0D43 should be respectively, U0B4D and U0B43.

This combination:
0b38 + 0b4d + ob2e + 0b43 

Now works in the latest font 2.0.1-1.


Comment 7 A S Alam 2007-04-27 11:55:41 UTC
Created attachment 153610 [details]
Verified Image

Comment 8 A S Alam 2007-04-27 11:57:26 UTC
verified version is:
fonts-oriya-2.1.5-1.fc7


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.