Bug 187481 – [or_IN]About the blwm

Bug 187481 - [or_IN]About the blwm

Summary:	[or_IN]About the blwm

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	fonts-indic (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Rahul Bhalerao
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	i18n

Depends On:
Blocks:	206581
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2006-03-31 04:41 EST by subhransu behera
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-04-27 07:57:26 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
This is how the combination should look like (51.33 KB, image/tiff) 2006-03-31 04:41 EST, subhransu behera	no flags	Details
Verified Image (2.53 KB, image/png) 2007-04-27 07:55 EDT, A S Alam	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description subhransu behera 2006-03-31 04:41:51 EST

Description of problem: Problem in Below-base mark positioning (blwm)


How reproducible:

While typing in yudit (with it's inbulid inscript key map) the following
combination is not properly displayed.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Type the U+0b38 U+0b4d U+0b2e U+0b4d U+0b30 U+0b09 in yudit
  
Actual results:

Combination with overlapping characters

Expected results:

Clear view of the combination

Comment 1 subhransu behera 2006-03-31 04:41:51 EST

Created attachment 127116 [details]
This is how the combination should look like

Comment 2 Leon Ho 2006-08-28 02:50:45 EDT

Does it work in gedit, evolution etc?

Comment 3 subhransu behera 2006-08-28 08:35:38 EDT

(In reply to comment #2)
> Does it work in gedit, evolution etc?

Hi Leon 

It doesn't work with gedit or evolution !

I had tested it earlier with utkal font which gave me this combination. But for
our Lohit font the rule is not correctly defined. I have also filed a bug for
the missing glyph for this combination.

Reference Bug ID # 194066

Combination is in list no # 18

Comment 5 Rahul Bhalerao 2006-09-14 06:47:47 EDT

The combination reported is here is wrong. The correct combination is:

   (Consonant + U0D4D + Consonant) + U0D43

Here the part which is inside bracket forms a conjunct with below base form. 
Thus when below base mark U0D43 follows, it overlaps the eairlier below base.
This is a GPOS problem. Below base anchor point pair needs to be deined for 
U0D43 and all the other below base glyphs.

Comment 6 Rahul Bhalerao 2006-09-18 03:32:55 EDT

In above comment U0D4D and U0D43 should be respectively, U0B4D and U0B43.

This combination:
0b38 + 0b4d + ob2e + 0b43 

Now works in the latest font 2.0.1-1.

Comment 7 A S Alam 2007-04-27 07:55:41 EDT

Created attachment 153610 [details]
Verified Image

Comment 8 A S Alam 2007-04-27 07:57:26 EDT

verified version is:
fonts-oriya-2.1.5-1.fc7

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.