Spec Name or Url: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Deep/perl-Test-Deep.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Deep-0.093-1.src.rpm Description: Test::Deep gives you very flexible ways to check that the result you got is the result you were expecting. At it's simplest it compares two structures by going through each level, ensuring that the values match, that arrays and hashes have the same elements and that references are blessed into the correct class. It also handles circular data structures without getting caught in an infinite loop.
The package builds in mock (development branch, with dependencies added) and rpmlint is silent. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: b47659e09457a72157d3db5b5be62f75 Test-Deep-0.093.tar.gz b47659e09457a72157d3db5b5be62f75 Test-Deep-0.093.tar.gz-srpm * package builds in mock. * BuildRequires are proper. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. * The package owns %{perl_vendorlib}/Test, which will probably also be owned by any module under the Test:: namespace. However, none of the dependencies create this directory so there is no alternative. APPROVED
Imported into CVS and builds requested.
Hi Steve, I see that there are existing EL-4 branches for perl-Test-Deep and its dependency perl-Test-NoWarnings but they haven't been built. I've tried building the packages in mock as they stand and they build OK, so is there some reason why they're not built for EPEL-4? If you're no longer interested in EPEL-4 I'll happily take those branches off your hands.
I had my packages mass-branched for EPEL when it started. I think there are still a lot of my packages that haven't been built for whatever reason. If you want to build those, go for it. (If you want to add yourself to those branches in pkgdb, go for it, but I'll watch for bugs either way.)
perl-Test-Deep-0.096-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Deep-0.096-1.el4
perl-Test-Deep-0.096-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.