+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #182294 +++
Description of problem: The X-server won't start for both antive & VESA drivers.
How reproducible: every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot from CD
2. attempting to start X-server with native driver - Failed
3. attempting to start X-server with VESA driver - Failed
Actual results: VGA+ display only.
Expected results: video normal.
AMD Athlon 64 X2 processor
ULi 1573 chipset
ATI RV370 Sapphire X550 graphics card
I had problems with PCIID recognition for my X550 in rawhide in the runup to
FC5, but at least VESA worked as a fallback and I could use a ChipId override
after install to force Xorg to work, however on FC5 final neither the radeon or
vesa drivers loaded during install, so I had to use vnc to install
working ok for me with xorg 7.1 in fc6t2
A new kernel update has been released (Version: 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5)
based upon a new upstream kernel release.
Please retest against this new kernel, as a large number of patches
go into each upstream release, possibly including changes that
may address this problem.
This bug has been placed in NEEDINFO state.
Due to the large volume of inactive bugs in bugzilla, if this bug is
still in this state in two weeks time, it will be closed.
Should this bug still be relevant after this period, the reporter
can reopen the bug at any time. Any other users on the Cc: list
of this bug can request that the bug be reopened by adding a
comment to the bug.
In the last few updates, some users upgrading from FC4->FC5
have reported that installing a kernel update has left their
systems unbootable. If you have been affected by this problem
please check you only have one version of device-mapper & lvm2
installed. See bug 207474 for further details.
If this bug is a problem preventing you from installing the
release this version is filed against, please see bug 169613.
If this bug has been fixed, but you are now experiencing a different
problem, please file a separate bug for the new problem.
(this is a mass-close to kernel bugs in NEEDINFO state)
As indicated previously there has been no update on the progress of this bug
therefore I am closing it as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Please re-open if the issue
still occurs for you and I will try to assist in its resolution. Thank you for
taking the time to report the initial bug.
If you believe that this bug was closed in error, please feel free to reopen