Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 189081
Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq
Last modified: 2007-11-30 17:11:30 EST
Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Prereq/perl-Test-Prereq.spec
SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Prereq-1.030-1.src.rpm
The prereq_ok() function examines the modules it finds in blib/lib/,
blib/script, and the test files it finds in t/ (and test.pl). It figures
out which modules they use, skips the modules that are in the Perl core,
and compares the remaining list of modules to those in the PREREQ_PM
section of Makefile.PL.
I'm assuming perl-Module-Info will be approved, so I'll go ahead and review this.
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
conforms to the Perl template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, i386).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directory it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present but necessarily disabled.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.
Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested.