Bug 1897979 - timeshift-21.09.1 is available
Summary: timeshift-21.09.1 is available
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: timeshift
Version: 35
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: srakitnican
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2010381 2014869 2019824 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-11-16 01:01 UTC by Upstream Release Monitoring
Modified: 2022-03-26 15:22 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version: timeshift-21.09.1-1.fc35 timeshift-21.09.1-1.fc36
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-03-24 16:15:19 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
[patch] Update to 20.11 (#1897979) (986 bytes, patch)
2020-11-16 01:01 UTC, Upstream Release Monitoring
no flags Details | Diff
[patch] Update to 20.11.1 (#1897979) (994 bytes, patch)
2020-11-16 15:07 UTC, Upstream Release Monitoring
no flags Details | Diff
[patch] Update to 21.09.1 (#1897979) (994 bytes, patch)
2021-09-25 07:38 UTC, Upstream Release Monitoring
no flags Details | Diff

Description Upstream Release Monitoring 2020-11-16 01:01:38 UTC
Latest upstream release: 20.11
Current version/release in rawhide: 20.03-2.fc33
URL: https://github.com/teejee2008/timeshift

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/16791/

Comment 1 Upstream Release Monitoring 2020-11-16 01:01:49 UTC
Created attachment 1729669 [details]
[patch] Update to 20.11 (#1897979)

Comment 2 Upstream Release Monitoring 2020-11-16 01:04:59 UTC
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of timeshift-20.11-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=55658523

Comment 3 Upstream Release Monitoring 2020-11-16 15:07:16 UTC
Latest upstream release: 20.11.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 20.03-2.fc33
URL: https://github.com/teejee2008/timeshift

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/16791/

Comment 4 Upstream Release Monitoring 2020-11-16 15:07:24 UTC
Created attachment 1729779 [details]
[patch] Update to 20.11.1 (#1897979)

Comment 5 Upstream Release Monitoring 2021-09-25 07:38:48 UTC
Latest upstream release: 21.09.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 20.03-4.fc35
URL: https://github.com/teejee2008/timeshift

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/16791/

Comment 6 Upstream Release Monitoring 2021-09-25 07:38:51 UTC
Created attachment 1826123 [details]
[patch] Update to 21.09.1 (#1897979)

Comment 7 Upstream Release Monitoring 2021-09-25 07:44:08 UTC
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of timeshift-21.09.1-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=76259277

Comment 8 Syaifur Rizal 2021-10-17 16:53:55 UTC
Hi,

I'm just upgrade from Fedora Linux 34 Workstation to Fedora Linux 35 Workstation and found that Timeshift 20.03 (latest packages on repos) didn't work.

From GUI it said that my system is running on Live USB and from the terminal it said failed to read partition layout. After read same problem reported on Timeshift Github repos, on my understanding it's because it's failed to read the result from `lsblk` (I believe on Fedora Linux 34 Workstation and Fedora Linux 35 Workstation have slightly different on showing the column of `MOUNTPOINTS`.

Luckily on 21.09.1 this bugs already fixed. Source: https://github.com/teejee2008/timeshift/issues/753

I tried to build it from latest version on Github and the bug is gone (for requirement on vte I end up build it from Gitlab to get the latest version https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/vte ).

I hope Timeshift will updated soon to version 21.09.1 especially on Fedora Linux 35 version and newer since I believe it's because the `lsblk` have different print result on `MOUNTPOINS` column.

Comment 9 Chase Lau 2021-10-28 03:12:08 UTC
+1 to Timeshift being broken on Fedora 35.

Comment 10 ingli 2021-11-03 21:59:18 UTC
What do you think, is https://forum.endeavouros.com/t/help-timeshift-in-live-usb-mode-as-device-uuid-not-found/14914 helpful to consider as a work around strategy?

Comment 11 Chase Lau 2021-11-04 12:19:29 UTC
Since this has been fixed upstream, you don’t need to apply the changes that forum post mentions. Building from source works fine.

Comment 12 Alessio 2021-11-26 22:56:25 UTC
*** Bug 2010381 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 Alessio 2021-11-26 22:58:23 UTC
*** Bug 2014869 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 14 Alessio 2021-11-26 22:59:02 UTC
*** Bug 2019824 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 15 ingli 2021-11-26 23:02:49 UTC
(In reply to Chase Lau from comment #11)
> Since this has been fixed upstream, you don’t need to apply the changes that
> forum post mentions. Building from source works fine.

I confirm, building from source works fine. Source seems to be https://github.com/teejee2008/timeshift - and I had to only install some dependency libraries, incl. json-glib-devel vte291-devel libgee-devel and vala
Thanks @Chase Lau

Comment 16 niohiani 2021-12-06 00:44:54 UTC
+1 here as well

The version of Timeshift in the repos does not work on f35 and up, for the reasons being discussed here.

Comment 17 niohiani 2021-12-07 02:33:56 UTC
For anyone interested, I just slapped a build of the most recent Timeshift release on COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/niohiani/MiscellanyMarketPlace/build/3010375/

Working fine on this end under Fedora 35. Very minimal changes to the spec file were needed (bumped version number, the patch in the spec from the repos is no longer needed, and the two config files are now in a timeshift directory under /etc).

Comment 18 Emanuele 2022-02-08 13:10:05 UTC
Timeshift on Fedora is maintained? To date the problem has not been solved and there are no updates, users report problems.

Comment 19 arto 2022-02-08 13:55:40 UTC
Please update Timeshift on Fedora repo

Comment 20 Fedora Update System 2022-03-15 18:06:37 UTC
FEDORA-2022-86afb128b6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-86afb128b6

Comment 21 Fedora Update System 2022-03-15 18:07:55 UTC
FEDORA-2022-e5a43878b7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-e5a43878b7

Comment 22 Fedora Update System 2022-03-16 14:56:50 UTC
FEDORA-2022-e5a43878b7 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-e5a43878b7`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-e5a43878b7

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 23 Fedora Update System 2022-03-16 16:25:43 UTC
FEDORA-2022-86afb128b6 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-86afb128b6`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-86afb128b6

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 24 Fedora Update System 2022-03-24 16:15:19 UTC
FEDORA-2022-86afb128b6 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 25 Fedora Update System 2022-03-26 15:22:28 UTC
FEDORA-2022-e5a43878b7 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.