* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
follows the Perl specfile template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
   a2c167d06509620921e4d417ce9354a7  HTTP-Recorder-0.05.tar.gz
   a2c167d06509620921e4d417ce9354a7  HTTP-Recorder-0.05.tar.gz-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=2, Tests=3,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.19 cusr +  0.06 csys =  0.25 CPU)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED

Thanks for the article link, BTW.

Thanks for the review.

Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel.

(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks for the article link, BTW.

This is a very interesting module.