python-citeproc-py fails to build with Python 3.10.0a5. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/builddir/build/BUILD/citeproc-py-0.5.1/setup.py", line 84, in <module> setup( File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/setuptools/__init__.py", line 153, in setup return distutils.core.setup(**attrs) File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/distutils/core.py", line 148, in setup dist.run_commands() File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/distutils/dist.py", line 966, in run_commands self.run_command(cmd) File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/distutils/dist.py", line 985, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/distutils/command/build.py", line 135, in run self.run_command(cmd_name) File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/distutils/cmd.py", line 313, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/distutils/dist.py", line 985, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File "/builddir/build/BUILD/citeproc-py-0.5.1/setup.py", line 74, in run convert_rnc() File "/builddir/build/BUILD/citeproc-py-0.5.1/setup.py", line 64, in convert_rnc import rnc2rng File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rnc2rng/__init__.py", line 1, in <module> from . import parser, serializer File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rnc2rng/parser.py", line 1, in <module> import rply, sys, os File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rply/__init__.py", line 3, in <module> from rply.parsergenerator import ParserGenerator File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rply/parsergenerator.py", line 12, in <module> from rply.grammar import Grammar File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rply/grammar.py", line 2, in <module> from rply.utils import iteritems File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rply/utils.py", line 2, in <module> from collections import MutableMapping ImportError: cannot import name 'MutableMapping' from 'collections' (/usr/lib64/python3.10/collections/__init__.py) bpo-37324: Remove deprecated aliases to Collections Abstract Base Classes from the collections module. https://docs.python.org/3.10/whatsnew/changelog.html#python-3-10-0-alpha-5 For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.10/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01952139-python-citeproc-py/ For all our attempts to build python-citeproc-py with Python 3.10, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.10/package/python-citeproc-py/ Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.10: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.10/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.10 will be included in Fedora 35. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with early pre-releases of Python 3.10. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 34 development cycle. Changing version to 34.
This is a mass-posted update. Sorry if it is not 100% accurate to this bugzilla. The Python 3.10 rebuild is in progress in a Koji side tag. If you manage to fix the problem, please commit the fix in the rawhide branch, but don't build the package in regular rawhide. You can either build the package in the side tag, with: $ fedpkg build --target=f35-python Or you can the build and we will eventually build it for you. Note that the rebuild is still in progress, so not all (build) dependencies of this package might be available right away. Thanks. See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10 If you have general questions about the rebuild, please use this mailing list thread: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/G47SGOYIQLRDTWGOSLSWERZSSHXDEDH5/
The f35-python side tag has been merged to Rawhide. From now on, build as you would normally build.
*** Bug 1968935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***