Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 193473
system-config-httpd references obsolete module names
Last modified: 2015-03-04 20:17:05 EST
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #180056 +++
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922
Description of problem:
system-config-httpd needs to be updated for compatibility with Apache 2.2 for
FC5 -- many of the LoadModules and includes in the generated httpd.conf file
fail when used with httpd-2.2.0-5.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start httpd-config-httpd on FC5T2 or later Rawhide.
2. Enter a server name and click OK (and OK on subsequent dialogs).
3. Restart Apache.
Actual Results: Apache does not start due to errors in the configuration file.
Expected Results: Apache should have started with the specified configuration.
Tested on FC5T2 and Rawhide 2006-02-04 and compared with FC4 and with the
httpd.conf supplied in the httpd-126.96.36.199 package. Sample error message when
starting Apache with a configuration file generaated by system-config-httpd:
httpd: Syntax error on line 170 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load
/etc/httpd/modules/mod_access.so into server: /etc/httpd/modules/mod_access.so:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
-- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2006-02-18 22:23 EST --
Created an attachment (id=124857)
Patch for /usr/share/system-config-httpd/httpd.conf.xsl
This patch updates the LoadModule directives in httpd.conf.xsl for
compatability with Apache 2.2 (FC5)
-- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2006-03-06 12:35 EST --
Thanks for the updated module list, i'll include it in the next build of s-c-h.
Read ya, Phil
-- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2006-03-31 02:01 EST --
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks for the updated module list, i'll include it in the next build of s-c-
> Read ya, Phil
I ran patch /usr/share/system-config-httpd/httpd.conf.xsl attachment.cgi and I
still receive the same error.
-- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2006-03-31 03:51 EST --
I figured out the problem: SELinux. I had to turn on "Allow HTTPD scripts and
modules to connect to the network." Is this a kludge or would this be
-- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2006-04-03 11:23 EST --
Ah, thats actually expected behaviour. By default with SELinux enabled your
system won't allow CGI scripts to be executed as they might pose a security risk.
So this is the correct way to "fix" this.
Read ya, Phil
-- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2006-04-09 07:48 EST --
*** Bug 188416 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
-- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2006-04-09 08:00 EST --
Ok, I did search for any open bugs on s-c-httpd before adding #188416, but
obviously this one had been closed, why was it closed as NOTABUG though?
-- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2006-04-11 09:11 EST --
How exactly do I run this patch?
-- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2006-04-11 09:24 EST --
Apply it with:
-- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2006-04-16 02:53 EST --
I am new to linux and do not know how to apply this patch. I have logged into
the gui, copied the text from the attachment for the patch and saved it as
system-config-httpd.patch in the directory /usr/share/system-config-httpd.
Then I followed the directions above from a shell...
The prompt just sits there and flashes.
I re-read the instructions and then at the shell I
typed "patch /usr/share/system-config-httpd system-config-httpd.patch" and
this time it gave me the message "Patch unexpectedly ended in the middle of
the patch line: *** Only garbage was found in the patch input."
I am not sure I am saving the patch like I need to. I am just copying it and
saving it as the filename.patch. Any ideas what I am doing wrong? Any help
would really be appreciated. Thank you.
-- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2006-04-19 10:44 EST --
This patch or the way to do don't works. How can i run my httpd without problems_
-- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2006-04-25 14:05 EST --
I followed the instructions here and this is the output I get when patching the
patch system-config-httpd system-config-httpd.patch
patching file system-config-httpd
Hunk #1 FAILED at 157.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 208.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file system-config-httpd.rej
any ideas how to fix this?
Thank in advanced
-- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2006-04-26 07:30 EST --
Could somebody please post the entire
-- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2006-05-28 14:23 EST --
It appears to me that this bug is still present into the
system-config-httpd.noarch 5:1.3.3-1.1 for distributed from the core repository
of Fedora core 5. I tried the patch and it works but I added this comment in
order to warn developers about that (I don't know if I did the right thing but
hope it is useful to someone).
Thanks... (Sorry if there is something wrong but I'm also new to linux)
Any word on when the update will happen? This is a high severity bug (The
package is just useless the way it is now) with a trivial fix. Surely it doesn't
need to take over 4 months.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 180056 ***