Description of problem: The cephadm generated ganesha.conf differs from what manila uses because there's no flexibility in configuring different options other than [1]. The Openstack ganesha config used for manila was generated by ceph-ansible through [2]. The ganesha config produced by the nfs cephadm deployed daemon breaks the backward compatibility with the ceph-ansible generated one. For this reason, even though bug [3] is solved, we won't still be able to properly configure the Manila project with Ceph. [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/src/pybind/mgr/cephadm/templates/services/nfs/ganesha.conf.j2 [2] https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/blob/master/roles/ceph-nfs/templates/ganesha.conf.j2 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1927716 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
moving past 5.1. I'd like to have Dimitri back, before looking into this.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.1 Security, Enhancement, and Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1174