Bug 2002142 - gnuradio fails to update from F34 to F35
Summary: gnuradio fails to update from F34 to F35
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1991471
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnuradio
Version: 35
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jaroslav Škarvada
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-09-08 05:10 UTC by Otto Liljalaakso
Modified: 2021-09-26 12:03 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-09-26 12:03:40 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Otto Liljalaakso 2021-09-08 05:10:35 UTC
Description of problem:

Package gnuradio cannot be updated from F34 to F35:

$ LANG=C sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync
...
Error: 
 Problem 2: problem with installed package gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64
  - package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always I believe

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install gnuradio on Fedora 34
2. Run the command given in description

Actual results:
Error as given in the description.

Expected results:
Update is possible

Comment 1 Daniel Rusek 2021-09-26 09:56:04 UTC
Today, I tried updating from F34 to F35 Beta and can confirm this problem:

Error: 
 Problem 1: problem with installed package gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64
  - package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 Problem 2: problem with installed package gqrx-2.14.4-1.fc34.x86_64
  - package gqrx-2.14.4-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libboost_thread.so.1.75.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - gqrx-2.14.4-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - boost-thread-1.75.0-4.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 Problem 3: cannot install both codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 and codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64
  - package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package lpcnetfreedv-0.2-9.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-analog.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-audio.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-blocks.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-channels.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-digital.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-fec.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-fft.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-filter.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-network.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-pmt.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-qtgui.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-runtime.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-soapy.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-trellis.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-uhd.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-video-sdl.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-vocoder.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-wavelet.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-zeromq.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires gnuradio(x86-64) = 3.9.2.0-5.fc35, but none of the providers can be installed
  - problem with installed package lpcnetfreedv-0.2-7.fc34.x86_64
  - problem with installed package gnuradio-devel-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64
  - lpcnetfreedv-0.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - gnuradio-devel-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)

By the way, isn't this already reported as bz#1991471 or is that a different issue?

Comment 2 Otto Liljalaakso 2021-09-26 12:03:40 UTC
> By the way, isn't this already reported as bz#1991471 or is that a different
> issue?

You are right, it is the same issue.
Probably my search for an existing issue
did not cover issues in RELEASE_PENDING state
(and I do not even understand itse description).
Marking this issue as a duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1991471 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.