Bug 2004030 - Storagecluster should have a reference under storageSystem
Summary: Storagecluster should have a reference under storageSystem
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: odf-operator
Version: 4.9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ODF 4.9.0
Assignee: Nitin Goyal
QA Contact: Anna Sandler
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2006760 2015312
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-09-14 11:57 UTC by Shay Rozen
Modified: 2023-08-09 17:00 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: v4.9.0-210.ci
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 2015312 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-12-13 17:46:17 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github red-hat-storage odf-operator pull 116 0 None open [WIP][UI]Add StorageCluster and FlashSystemCluster Reference under StorageSystem 2021-10-18 07:07:39 UTC
Github red-hat-storage odf-operator pull 123 0 None open Bug 2004030:[release-4.9] [UI]Add StorageCluster and FlashSystemCluster Reference under StorageSystem 2021-10-19 15:09:32 UTC
Github red-hat-storage odf-operator pull 128 0 None open Add ownerReference on the vendor CR 2021-10-26 13:46:52 UTC
Github red-hat-storage odf-operator pull 129 0 None open Bug 2004030:[release-4.9] Add ownerReference on the vendor CR 2021-10-26 15:34:43 UTC
Github red-hat-storage odf-operator pull 95 0 None open Add RelatedResources in the status of StorageSystem 2021-09-15 17:09:15 UTC
Github red-hat-storage odf-operator pull 97 0 None open Bug 2004030:[release-4.9] Add RelatedResources in the status of StorageSystem 2021-09-16 16:05:32 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2021:5086 0 None None None 2021-12-13 17:46:45 UTC

Internal Links: 2044447

Description Shay Rozen 2021-09-14 11:57:08 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):
After introduction of ODF there is no reference to storagecluster. It can only be seen in custom resource.


Version of all relevant components (if applicable):
odf 4.9 all version

Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?
The customer can't see the relation to storagecluster

Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?
No

Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?
1

Can this issue reproducible?
yes

Can this issue reproduce from the UI?
yes

If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:
No

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install OCP 4.9 + ODF operator.
2. Create storageSystem



Actual results:
Storagecluster is not seen in any place under ODF.

Expected results:
Storagecluster should have some reference under storageSystem.

Additional info:
https://chat.google.com/room/AAAA76Pbvwc/zcJBZnKbfO4

Comment 7 Anna Sandler 2021-09-30 18:18:08 UTC
changes are not seen in the console. see attached shoot
moving back to assigned 


odf-operator.v4.9.0-164.ci

Comment 8 Nitin Goyal 2021-10-01 13:40:26 UTC
Hi Anna,

Can you pls show the output of the storageSystem from CLI in the YAML format?

Comment 10 Nitin Goyal 2021-10-05 15:43:29 UTC
@badhikar As we can see the relatedObjects in comment 9 why is it not getting shown in the UI? Am I missing something else here?

Comment 12 Mudit Agarwal 2021-10-11 07:43:28 UTC
Afreen, as Bipul is on PTO. Can you please take a look at #comment10

Comment 21 Anna Sandler 2021-11-01 17:55:58 UTC
storage cluster is seen under storage system resources
moving to verified

Comment 23 errata-xmlrpc 2021-12-13 17:46:17 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.9.0 enhancement, security, and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:5086


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.