Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok). Your package (dotnet3.1) Fails To Install in Fedora 36: can't install dotnet-runtime-3.1: - nothing provides liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit) needed by dotnet-runtime-3.1-3.1.17-2.fc35.x86_64 If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages Thanks!
Hello, This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs). If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.
This lttng upgrade which breaks ABI is very unfortunate for .NET. To fix this, we would need to patch and re-build .NET. But .NET needs itself to build, and the .NET-we-build-with can't be installed because the required lttng-ust version is missing. The new version of lttng-ust is also turning out to have bugs. It makes .NET crash on startup: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/57784 All that said, this bug is definitely something I intend to fix. I am waiting for the next upstream release of .NET Core (should be out later this month, hopefully), which will require a re-bootstrap anyway.
Would providing a temporary build of lttng-ust that has both new and old runtime so-library be helpful to rebuild .NET with the new one?
I am not sure. For some context, last month upstream .NET accidentally broke the upgrade path of using a previous .NET Core 3.1 release to build the next 3.1 release. Only a nightly release will work now. They are still working on some fixes, but we will need to start with a prebuilt .NET Core 3.1 (where I can disable lttng support at runtime, bypassing the dependency) and then use that to re-bootstrap and build the next release of .NET Core 3.1. Since I have to re-bootstrap .NET Core 3.1 from prebuilt binaries on all active releases (F34, F35, Rawhide) anyway, having an older lttng isn't essential right now. It's nice to have, but definitely not a blocker at the moment. Separately, others in my team have suggested making lttng-ust an optional dependency. It already is optional - .NET Core works fine if lttng-ust is not installed - but RPM's automatic dependency finder thinks it's required. So maybe I will do that and just filter it out from RPM's automatic requires detection when I rebootstrap and rebuild .NET Core.
*** Bug 2045318 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok). All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 36. Thanks for taking care of it!