Bug 203042 - Review Request: jakarta-oro (RENAME ONLY)
Summary: Review Request: jakarta-oro (RENAME ONLY)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: oro
Version: 3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Fernando Nasser
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FC-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-08-17 22:40 UTC by Fernando Nasser
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-08-21 19:34:59 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fernando Nasser 2006-08-17 22:40:22 UTC
Spec URL: same spec as the current oro
SRPM URL: same SRPM as the current oro
Description: same as before

This package was renamed upstream to include the 'jakarta-' prefix at the
request of the Jakarta folks.  It is part of that project like the other
jakarta-* ones that we have.

Proper "Obsoletes:" and "Provides:" will be added.

Provides:       oro = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:      oro <= 0:2.0.8

and

Provides:       oro-javadoc = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:      oro-javadoc <= 0:2.0.8

So the javadoc part also gets replaced.

Comment 1 Jesse Keating 2006-08-21 19:10:45 UTC
Since epoch is 0, you don't need to list that as part of our Provides.  (or in
the spec at all)

Do you really need to define name, version, and release, just to fill them in at
Name: Version: and Release:?  Please don't do that.

Othewise looks ok, for a java package (:

Please create an srpm with the new name and import it as jakarta-oro.  We'll
stop using the 'oro' module.  This would be a good time to change the release
string to remove the _.

Added to dist-fc6.  Please close when built into rawhide.

Comment 2 Fernando Nasser 2006-08-21 19:27:40 UTC
Yes, the duplicate definition for name, version and release had already been
removed from the package in the latest upstream release, which incorporated GCJ
AOT bits (otherwise the same), so I merged that in.  All new packages are being
rebuilt without the '_NNfc' -- this one will be a .1 (as the first of our builds
from this upstream release).  The only thing that was not yet done was the
removal of Epoch as we are trying to get it removed from all upstream packages
so that the next round only have the Epoch > 1 ones specified.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.