Bug 2031268 - ImageMagick for EPEL 9
Summary: ImageMagick for EPEL 9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: ImageMagick
Version: epel9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Luya Tshimbalanga
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2031205 2032193 2034301 2036854 2047560
Blocks: EPELPackagersSIG 2031800 2032211 2032229 2034031 2052694
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-12-10 21:56 UTC by Xavier Bachelot
Modified: 2022-02-22 03:16 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ImageMagick-6.9.12.40-1.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-02-22 03:16:53 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Xavier Bachelot 2021-12-10 21:56:31 UTC
Hi,

Could you please branch and build ImageMagick for EPEL 9 ?

Regards,
Xavier

Comment 1 Luya Tshimbalanga 2021-12-20 04:17:39 UTC
Missing in EPEL9 repository: 

DEBUG util.py:444:  No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(ddjvuapi)'
DEBUG util.py:444:  No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(libwmf)'
DEBUG util.py:444:  No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(lqr-1)'
DEBUG util.py:444:  No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(raqm)'

Comment 2 Phil Baker 2022-01-27 03:06:16 UTC
Just touching base, since it's been a little over a month. Are we waiting for 2031205 and 2036854 to be resolved? 

Thank you for your work,

Phil

Comment 3 Neal Gompa 2022-01-28 01:31:52 UTC
A new scratch build works on x86_64, but on other architectures, it fails because libRaw-devel doesn't exist there. That build dependency needs to be conditioned out for non-x86_64.

This should be ready to build for EPEL 9 otherwise.

Comment 4 Xavier Bachelot 2022-01-28 09:29:12 UTC
This is yet another case of missing -devel, only x86_64 and ppc64le are shipped, aarch64 and s390x are missing.
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/release-engineering/comps/-/blob/main/comps-centos-stream-9.xml.in#L3190
Maybe one should also file a bug for requesting the missing arches to be added to the compose.

Comment 6 Neal Gompa 2022-02-10 20:09:54 UTC
LibRaw-devel is now available in EPEL 9 for AArch64 and s390x from EPEL.

Update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f989fe200c
Override: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/LibRaw-epel-0.20.2-0.el9.6

You should be able to build ImageMagick now for EPEL 9.

Comment 7 Neal Gompa 2022-02-11 04:41:32 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build ImageMagick in epel9?
The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel9.

Comment 8 Michel Lind 2022-02-11 05:25:50 UTC
There's also a *ton* of CVEs for EPEL 8, so I highly suggest adding epel-packagers-sig as comaintainer, as it seems we should update that package in epel8 or retire it

Comment 9 Sergio Basto 2022-02-11 10:30:12 UTC
(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #8)
> There's also a *ton* of CVEs for EPEL 8, so I highly suggest adding
> epel-packagers-sig as comaintainer, as it seems we should update that
> package in epel8 or retire it

yep , I'm thinking in make a side tag to upgrade ImageMagick, because have soname bump , I hadn't time yet

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-02-21 17:37:16 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4f7c4db58e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4f7c4db58e

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-02-22 03:16:53 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4f7c4db58e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.