Bug 2034331 - Please branch and build signify in epel9
Summary: Please branch and build signify in epel9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: signify
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert Scheck
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2030098
Blocks: 2034332 2034334
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-12-20 17:34 UTC by Peter Georg
Modified: 2022-06-09 00:41 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: signify-30-6.el9
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-06-09 00:41:58 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Peter Georg 2021-12-20 17:34:07 UTC
(Reporting against Product "Fedora" not "Fedora EPEL" as component signify is not listed for "Fedora EPEL")

Please branch and build signify in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain signify in epel9,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package.

I have tested and the rawhide package is currently missing one dependency on CentOS Stream 9 (libbsd-devel). Adding this missing dependency the rawhide package builds on CentOS Stream 9 without any changes.

Comment 1 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 21:20:01 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2022-05-28 22:39:05 UTC
If you do not wish to maintain signify in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS robert); please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/signify/adduser

Comment 3 Marcus Müller 2022-05-28 22:43:26 UTC
Done that. I'm not contributing to EPEL > 8, for the foreseeable future.

Comment 4 Marcus Müller 2022-05-28 22:46:44 UTC
Added Robert, as I can verify his FAS group memberships. @Peter Georg, I'm having a hard time finding your FAS user, sorry! If you share it with me, I can add you as well.

Comment 5 Robert Scheck 2022-05-28 23:03:34 UTC
Thank you!

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/44666

Comment 6 Robert Scheck 2022-05-28 23:10:58 UTC
Btw, Peter is FAS pjgeorg (based on the e-mail address).

Comment 7 Marcus Müller 2022-05-28 23:15:01 UTC
Can't check https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/pjgeorg right now, as it throws HTTP 502 errors. So, since I'll be off for a while: you're now admin! Please add him if he sees trustworthy and has signed the agreement and packaged something before. You know the drill better than I do :)

Comment 8 Marcus Müller 2022-05-28 23:15:31 UTC
ah works again. Done.

Comment 9 Peter Georg 2022-05-30 12:08:22 UTC
Marcus: Thanks for adding me!

Robert: Please let me know if I can be of any help. The initial setup is probably best done by one person.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-05-31 22:27:51 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-59dbd0f182 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-59dbd0f182

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-06-01 03:11:02 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-59dbd0f182 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-59dbd0f182

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2022-06-09 00:41:58 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-59dbd0f182 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.