+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2038283 +++ This is a dependency for public-inbox, that I'm trying to package for EPEL8 and 9. I'm happy to comaintain (FAS: salimma) and be set to be the POC for EPEL bugs. You can also add the epel-packagers-sig group as collaborator on epel* branches. Thanks! --- Additional comment from Michel Alexandre Salim on 2022-01-15 15:56:35 PST --- Will you be able to branch and build perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy in epel8 and epel9? I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9 (FAS salimma). --- Additional comment from Emmanuel Seyman on 2022-01-16 01:01:13 PST --- I've requested an epel8 branch: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41013 For EPEL9, we still need perl-Plack --- Additional comment from Michel Alexandre Salim on 2022-01-19 21:59:56 PST --- (In reply to Emmanuel Seyman from comment #2) > I've requested an epel8 branch: > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41013 > > For EPEL9, we still need perl-Plack thanks, looks like the branch is processed. Can we just build this for EPEL 8 first? EPEL 9 is less urgent, for my package there are other missing dependencies and those requesting EPEL are still mostly on 8 for the next few months.
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41810
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-03ca67dda6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-03ca67dda6
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-03ca67dda6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-03ca67dda6 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-03ca67dda6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.