Bug 206238 - Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager
Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 229478
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-09-13 02:17 EDT by Akira TAGOH
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-12-01 08:47:41 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Mock build of qdbm-1.8.70-1 (59.82 KB, text/plain)
2006-10-11 11:38 EDT, Mamoru TASAKA
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Akira TAGOH 2006-09-13 02:17:42 EDT
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/qdbm/qdbm.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/qdbm/qdbm-1.8.70-1.src.rpm
Description:
QDBM is an embedded database library compatible with GDBM and NDBM.
It features hash database and B+ tree database and is developed referring
to GDBM for the purpose of the following three points: higher processing
speed, smaller size of a database file, and simpler API.
Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2006-09-13 08:05:10 EDT
- mock build for FC6 i386 is not sucessfull
while processing qdbm package mock gave following messages.
/usr/bin/strip: unable to copy file
'/var/tmp/qdbm-1.8.70-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Depot/Depot.so'
reason: Permission denied
/usr/bin/strip: unable to copy file
'/var/tmp/qdbm-1.8.70-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Curia/Curia.so'
reason: Permission denied
/usr/bin/strip: unable to copy file
'/var/tmp/qdbm-1.8.70-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Villa/Villa.so'
reason: Permission denied


- rpmlint is also not silent
Akira,
 I suggest you to mock build your package and see for rpmlint errors. There are
huge number of rpmlint errors and warnigs from all your packages. I cannot post
all of them.

Correct rpmlint output to be silent and update your package.
For more information about rpmlint errors use 
rpmlint -iv RPMname
And check description below each error to solve it.


Comment 2 Akira TAGOH 2006-09-14 01:56:57 EDT
the build itself is no problem for me on even mock. I'll fix the rpmlint things
though.
Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2006-09-14 02:29:32 EDT
I think that is more important first to fix rpmlint errors and warnings.
Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2006-10-11 11:38:20 EDT
Created attachment 138250 [details]
Mock build of qdbm-1.8.70-1

Mock build of qdbm-1.8.70-1 under FC-devel i386.

Well, what is the status of this review request? It seems
almost one month has passed without no progress.

I cannot rebuild this by mockbuild (and even by rpmbuild). See the log 
attached. 
Although building ended with failure, build log already has a problem.

+ make
gcc -c -I. -I/builddir/include -I/usr/local/include  -DMYPTHREAD -DMYZLIB
-DMYBZIP -DMYICONV -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED=1 -D_GNU_SOURCE=1
-D__EXTENSIONS__=1 -D_HPUX_SOURCE=1 -D_POSIX_MAPPED_FILES=1
-D_POSIX_SYNCHRONIZED_IO=1 -DPIC=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -D_REENTRANT=1 -DNDEBUG
-Wall -pedantic -fPIC -fsigned-char -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr
-minline-all-stringops depot.c

This is incorrect because:
* Fedora CFLAGS is not used.
* This uses "-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer". This disables debugging.
Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2006-11-23 17:57:52 EST
Again ping?

I wait for one week before I close this bug as CLOSED FE-DEADREVIEW.
Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2006-12-01 08:14:09 EST
I wait another one day before marking this as CLOSED FE-DEADREVIEW.
Comment 7 Akira TAGOH 2006-12-01 08:33:10 EST
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. I'm being busy now. so I don't think
I can continue to work on this so far. if it would be appropriate, I don't mind
to close this. when I get a time and someone doesn't work on yet, I'll reopen
this then.

Thanks,
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2006-12-01 08:44:10 EST
Thank you for reply. Now I once close this bug.
Please feel free to reopen this bug when you are willing to
do so.
Comment 9 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-21 08:25:02 EST
Hello, Akira and Parag:

I rechecked Akira's srpm/spec and resumbitted as a new
request as bug 229478.

If you are interested, I would appreciate if you review
my review request. Thanks.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 229478 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.