Bug 229478 - Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager
Summary: Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Parag AN(पराग)
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
: 206238 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT 229647
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-02-21 13:19 UTC by Mamoru TASAKA
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-02-23 14:28:44 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
panemade: fedora-review+
dennis: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-21 13:19:13 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/qdbm.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/qdbm-1.8.74-1.fc7.src.rpm
Mockbuild log on FC7 i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-qdbm.log

QDBM is an embedded database library compatible with GDBM and NDBM.
It features hash database and B+ tree database and is developed referring
to GDBM for the purpose of the following three points: higher processing
speed, smaller size of a database file, and simpler API.

rpmlint on binary rpm:
W: qdbm++-devel no-documentation
W: qdbm-java devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libjqdbm.so
   Well, I don't know well about java package, however
   I think that there is no need to create another -japa-devel
   package for this .so file.

Co-maintainers are welcome!!

Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-21 13:25:15 UTC
*** Bug 206238 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-02-22 06:16:57 UTC
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM 
- rpmlint is NOT for RPM.
  (But following rpmlint warning can be ignored      
   W: qdbm-java devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libjqdbm.so)
+ source files match upstream.
73f9d2fa4627a321062c4a4de7264946  qdbm-1.8.74.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no static libraries.
+ .pc files present.
+ -devel,-cgi,-java,-perl, qdbm++, qdbm++-devel, ruby-qdbm subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.

Comment 3 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-22 14:25:38 UTC
I submitted hyperestraier (bug 229647) which depends on
this package.

Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-22 21:50:46 UTC
Some mistakes are found.


* Fri Feb 23 2007 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> - 1.8.74-2
- Add missing release dependency
- Change group from Development to System Environment
- Remove duplicate files and fix the dependency for main package.

Comment 5 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-02-23 10:23:10 UTC
Oops I missed that one. I checked buildlog only and my eyes missed to check
duplicate files when i did rpm -qlvp on RPMS.
Thanks for catching that.

Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-23 10:42:00 UTC
Thank you for reviewing and approving my package!!

Now I write a CVS request to cvs admin for a new package.
New Package CVS Request
Package Name:           qdbm
Short Description:      Quick Database Manager
Owners:                 mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Branches:               FC-5 FC-6 FC-devel
InitialCC:              (nobody)

Comment 7 Dennis Gilmore 2007-02-23 12:57:33 UTC

Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-23 14:28:44 UTC
First, qdbm rebuild succeeded on FC-devel/6/5.

Thank you for review again!!
(Review process changed from NEXTRELEASE -> RAWHIDE)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.