Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 206246
[ml_IN] Issues with cursor position as well vowels
Last modified: 2016-07-31 21:30:49 EDT
IN GEDIT: Description of problem: In some words, where the letter (say A) from the combination - (U+0d38) + (0d4d) + (0d31) + (0d4d) + (0d31) is used after the Chillu consonants*, when the vowel (U + 0d4b) is used along with, this is applied for the chillu conjunct also. This is wrong as the vowel (U + 0d4b) is to be only applied to A. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: (explaining with an example) 1.Open gedit 2.type any chillu consonant*, eg: (U+0d28) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) 3.type (U+0d38) + (0d4d) + (0d31) + (0d4d) + (0d31) 4.type any vowel (U+0d48),(U+0d4A),(U+0d4B) or (U+0d4C) Actual results: when step 4 is done, the vowel is applied for Chillu consonant* also. Expected results: When step 4 is done, it should be applied only for the letter ((U+0d38) + (0d4d) + (0d31) + (0d4d) + (0d31)) IN KEDIT: Description of problem: In some words, where the letter (say A) from the combination - (U+0d38) + (0d4d) + (0d31) + (0d4d) + (0d31) is used after the Chillu consonants*, when the vowel (U + 0d4b) is used along with,the focus of cursor is lost, and appears between the word instead of the cursor point coming at the end. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open kedit 2.type any chillu consonant*, eg: (U+0d28) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) 3.type (U+0d38) + (0d4d) + (0d31) + (0d4d) + (0d31) 4.type any vowel (U+0d48),(U+0d4A),(U+0d4B) or (U+0d4C) Actual results: when step 4 is done,the focus of cursor is lost. Expected results: When step 4 is done,the cursor should appear at end of the word. A SIMILAR ISSUE: 1.open kedit 2.type any chillu consonant*, eg: (U+0d28) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) 3.type any of : (U+0d32), (U+Od30), (U+0d2F) or (U+0d36) 4.type any vowel (U+0d48),(U+0d4A),(U+0d4B) or (U+0d4C) Actual results: when step 4 is done, the vowel is applied for Chillu consonant* also. Expected results: when step 4 is done, the vowel should be only for the letter typed on step 3 ((U+0d32), (U+Od30), (U+0d2F) or (U+0d36)) IN GEDIT, this is working fine. * -> there are five chillu consonants formed as shown below: - (U+0d28) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) - (U+0d30) or (U+0d31) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) - (U+0d32) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) - (U+0d33) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) - (U+0d23) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d)
Look like this is a Qt problem. Reassigning to Qt.
There are two problems here. 1. character at step 4 isn't conjunct properly in gedit, [step 4's char][step 2's char][step 3's char] though, in kedit, [step 2's char][step 4's char][step 3's char] 2. the character width is miscalculated internally actually the cursor position is at the end of line afterward. but the character width is miscalculated or ignored one character's width perhaps, then it just looks like that.
as per comment by Sachin as following: --------------- This is the bug which is filed against three different problems, which includes cursor position, pango issue, and vowel issue. So I filed 3 different bugs and submitted patch for two QT related bugs. As per order 1. Cursor position issue with QT in ml_IN 2. Voewl assignment issue with QT in ml_IN 3. Vowel assignment issue with pango in ml_IN --------------- filing bug later...
Bug is split in following two bugs: 1. Cursor position issue with QT in ml_IN : Bug #238894 2. Vowel assignment issue with pango in ml_IN : Bug # 238896
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
Since this bug is already split into two different bugs, I think it should be closed now.
closed it since this bug is already split into two different bugs Bug #238894, Bug # 238896 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 238896 ***