Bug 207089 - [ml_IN] the glyphs of the conjuctions about Cons + 0d4d + 0d33 are wrong
[ml_IN] the glyphs of the conjuctions about Cons + 0d4d + 0d33 are wrong
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 208525
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: fonts-indic (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Rahul Bhalerao
: i18n
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-09-19 05:14 EDT by Liang Zhang
Modified: 2015-04-06 23:06 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-09-29 06:32:22 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
the image (7.86 KB, image/png)
2006-09-19 05:31 EDT, Liang Zhang
no flags Details
my patch (352 bytes, patch)
2006-09-19 05:34 EDT, Liang Zhang
no flags Details | Diff
modified patch (614 bytes, patch)
2006-09-19 06:44 EDT, Liang Zhang
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Liang Zhang 2006-09-19 05:14:40 EDT
Description of problem:
The glyphs of the conjuctions about Cons + 0d4d + 0d33 are wrong.
The details are below in the image:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:
Comment 1 Liang Zhang 2006-09-19 05:31:31 EDT
Created attachment 136615 [details]
the image

the image of comparing wrong glyph and right glyph
Comment 2 Liang Zhang 2006-09-19 05:34:06 EDT
Created attachment 136616 [details]
my patch

I wrote a patch for fixing this bug.
Please review it.
Comment 3 Liang Zhang 2006-09-19 06:44:27 EDT
Created attachment 136622 [details]
modified patch

modify the patch for fix the bug about 0d33+0d4d+0d33.
Comment 4 Lawrence Lim 2006-09-29 03:44:00 EDT
Which bug priority is this linked to??
Comment 5 Leon Ho 2006-09-29 06:32:22 EDT
The patch is no longer applicable. duplicate to 2.0.5-1 + bug #208525 fix.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 208525 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.