Description of problem: Once again, XFS is not included in the standard distribution. Suse has an Enterprise distro, they include XFS in theirs. All the Super Computer sites use XFS. Why not RedHat? Centos provides XFS rpms. Under 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 EXT3 yeilds ~680MB/Sec reading 4 hardware raid0 devices. (in this case either hardware raid0 sata drives, or LSI SAS raid drives). Using XFS I obtain 1.2GB/Sec from the identical hardware. This is 99% line rate. I get at best 200MB/Sec write rates with EXT3, but 1.04GB/Sec with XFS. What gives? Do I have to roll my own kernel and fustrate the security types who want *ONLY* a standard redhat kernel, or just discard the FibreChannel connections just to get a HUGE performance increase? We are in the business of HIGH performance. I cannot justify spending $2,500 on a distro that will not provide one kernel module and 2 support RPMS. XFS is standard in the linux distro. I'm not asking for /root to be XFS, just data partitions. Berkley Shands Software Architect, R & D Manager for Exegy, Inc. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Filed against rhel5-rc1, which doesn't exist. Moving to rhel5-beta1.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 205935 ***