RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2082681 - google-noto-fonts: google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts and some others missing in c9s
Summary: google-noto-fonts: google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts and some others missing in...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: google-noto-fonts
Version: CentOS Stream
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Akira TAGOH
QA Contact: Bhushan Barve
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: EPELPackagersSIG ChromiumEPEL9
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-05-06 18:27 UTC by Michel Lind
Modified: 2022-11-15 11:22 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: google-noto-fonts-20201206-4.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-11-15 10:22:51 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
missing noto fonts in c9s compared to Fedora 37 (20.69 KB, text/plain)
2022-09-30 20:21 UTC, Michel Lind 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-121297 0 None None None 2022-10-02 13:26:27 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2022:8116 0 None None None 2022-11-15 10:22:55 UTC

Description Michel Lind 2022-05-06 18:27:15 UTC 
Description of problem:
google-noto-fonts in Fedora ships a symbols2-fonts subpackage, which is needed to build Chromium; the one in CentOS Stream does not (or it's filtered out when publishing the RPMs).


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
20201206-3.el9

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
dnf search google-noto-sans-symbol

Actual results:
Only one result: google-noto-sans-symbols-fonts

Expected results:
Same as on Fedora

$ sudo dnf search google-noto-sans-symbol
=================================================== Name Matched: google-noto-sans-symbol ===================================================
google-noto-sans-symbols-fonts.noarch : Noto Sans Symbols font
google-noto-sans-symbols-vf-fonts.noarch : Noto Sans Symbols variable font
google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts.noarch : Noto Sans Symbols2 font

Additional info:
Comment 2 Akira TAGOH 2022-05-11 05:57:12 UTC 
To clarify a bit more about "some others", what exactly packages do you need to build Chromium?  Is it only needed for the build or required at the runtime too?
Comment 3 Akira TAGOH 2022-05-17 08:44:35 UTC 
Okay, I found this in chromium.spec:
BuildRequires:	google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts
Comment 5 Michel Lind 2022-05-25 18:57:55 UTC 
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #2)
> To clarify a bit more about "some others", what exactly packages do you need
> to build Chromium?  Is it only needed for the build or required at the
> runtime too?

the other font package I noticed was missing is google-noto-sans-symbols-vf-fonts, but only google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts is missing for the purpose of building Chromium. vf-fonts is still missing but I see symbols2-fonts in -3 (presumably vf is in -4?). Thanks!

Name         : google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts
Version      : 20201206
Release      : 3.el9
Architecture : noarch
Size         : 276 k
Source       : google-noto-fonts-20201206-3.el9.src.rpm
Repository   : crb
Summary      : Noto Sans Symbols2 font
URL          : https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-fonts/
License      : OFL
Description  : Noto fonts aims to remove tofu from web by providing fonts for all
             : Unicode supported scripts. Its design goal is to achieve visual harmonization
             : between multiple scripts. Noto family supports almost all scripts available
             : in Unicode.
             : Noto Sans Symbols2 font.
Comment 6 Akira TAGOH 2022-05-27 04:15:04 UTC 
Can you elaborate more why those "others" are needed, what happens if it is missing, whether there are any substitute fonts in rhel9 so far or not?
Actually this has almost done. so do you want to file another bug with it if you like?
Comment 12 Michel Lind 2022-09-30 20:21:37 UTC 
Created attachment 1915350 [details]
missing noto fonts in c9s compared to Fedora 37
Comment 13 Michel Lind 2022-09-30 20:27:31 UTC 
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #6)
> Can you elaborate more why those "others" are needed, what happens if it is
> missing, whether there are any substitute fonts in rhel9 so far or not?
> Actually this has almost done. so do you want to file another bug with it if
> you like?

Uploaded the list of all missing fonts. Is there a reason why we don't just ship all the fonts? some are curious, e.g. for CJK, only JP is shipped, not KR, SC (simplified Chinese) and TC (traditional Chinese). And the Sans Mono for CJK is all missing, ditto Serif CJK except for Serif-CJK-TTC.

I can open another bug if that's easier, another usecase (not Chromium) we have internally is we use these fonts for some file conversions
Comment 14 Akira TAGOH 2022-10-02 13:16:56 UTC 
(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #13)
> Uploaded the list of all missing fonts. Is there a reason why we don't just
> ship all the fonts? some are curious, e.g. for CJK, only JP is shipped, not
> KR, SC (simplified Chinese) and TC (traditional Chinese). And the Sans Mono
> for CJK is all missing, ditto Serif CJK except for Serif-CJK-TTC.

Strictly speaking, Noto CJK fonts isn't a part of google-noto-fonts though, they have different reason; Noto CJK fonts which has those JP, KR, SC, and TC in the package name is actually duplicate. google-noto-*-cjk-ttc-fonts covers them, including Mono.
In that sense, we should drop JP there.
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2022-11-15 10:22:51 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (google-noto-fonts bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:8116
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.