Bug 209513 – gjdoc requires antlr on classpath

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 209513 - gjdoc requires antlr on classpath

Summary:	gjdoc requires antlr on classpath

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 209595

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	gjdoc (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Andrew Overholt
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2006-10-05 14:30 EDT by Anthony Green
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-10-06 14:48:28 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Anthony Green 2006-10-05 14:30:39 EDT

Description of problem:
When I build the kawa SRPM, I need to add antlr to the classpath in order 
for gjdoc to run.  Isn't there some other way to force antlr in there so users
don't have to add it manually?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.install the kawa SRPM from devel
2.remove antlr from the classpath
3.build it
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Andrew Overholt 2006-10-05 17:59:03 EDT

antlr.jar *is* on the gjdoc classpath.  It's not a Requirement of it, though. 
I've fixed this and pushed a build.  Hopefully we can get this into FC6 or at
least soon afterwards as an update.

Comment 2 Anthony Green 2006-10-05 20:01:01 EDT

antlr.jar is not on the classpath in my test case.  See...

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2006-October/msg00003.html

Note that in my case the code is being invoked directly by ant, isn't it?

Comment 3 Tom Tromey 2006-10-05 20:08:44 EDT

I'm under the impression that ant execs javadoc, and does not
try to invoke it directly.  I haven't looked at the code to
verify this, however.  Still, there's nothing in that stack trace
that indicates ant.

Comment 4 Stepan Kasal 2006-10-06 05:43:07 EDT

Bug 209595 might be related to this.

Comment 5 Andrew Overholt 2006-10-06 14:48:28 EDT

I *think* this is a dupe.  If not, please re-open, Anthony.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 209595 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.