Bug 2108489 - [CephFS metadata information missing during a Ceph upgrade]
Summary: [CephFS metadata information missing during a Ceph upgrade]
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Cephadm
Version: 5.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 6.1
Assignee: Adam King
QA Contact: Vinayak Papnoi
Akash Raj
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2180567
Blocks: 2192813
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-07-19 08:14 UTC by nravinas
Modified: 2023-06-15 10:11 UTC (History)
22 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-17.2.6-5.el9cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.The manager daemons correctly identify they have been upgraded and no longer failover Previously, a check for whether the current active manager was running the upgraded version of `cephadm` would not work, and sometimes, managers that were upgraded would think that they were on an older version. Due to this, the upgrade would get into a state where all the mgr daemons were upgraded, but they were still in line to be redeployed by a manager using the upgraded version of `cephadm`, causing it to repeatedly just failover between the manager daemons. With this fix, the check is rectified and now, the manager daemons are aware of their correct version, and can redeploy other daemons using the upgraded version of `cephadm`.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-15 09:15:33 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-4812 0 None None None 2022-07-19 08:18:53 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2023:3623 0 None None None 2023-06-15 09:16:56 UTC

Comment 48 errata-xmlrpc 2023-06-15 09:15:33 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 6.1 security and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:3623
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.