Bug 2114501 - [RDR] User is able to set value 0 minutes as Sync schedule while creating DR Policy and it reports 'Sync' as Replication policy and gets Validated on a RDR setup
Summary: [RDR] User is able to set value 0 minutes as Sync schedule while creating DR ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: management-console
Version: 4.11
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ODF 4.12.0
Assignee: Sanjal Katiyar
QA Contact: Aman Agrawal
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2094357 2107226
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-08-02 18:27 UTC by Aman Agrawal
Modified: 2023-12-08 04:29 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.12.0-79
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.`async` replication can no longer be set to `0` Previously, you could enter any value for `Sync schedule`. This meant you could set `async` replication to `0`, which caused an error. With this update, a number input has been introduced that does not allow a value lower than 1. `async` replication now works correctly.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-02-08 14:06:28 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
UX Mockup (375.61 KB, image/png)
2022-10-11 07:17 UTC, Chandan 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github red-hat-storage odf-console pull 493 0 None open add number increment input for sync interval 2022-10-14 11:21:27 UTC
Github red-hat-storage odf-console pull 505 0 None open Bug 2114501: [release-4.12] add number increment input for sync interval 2022-10-19 09:25:23 UTC
Github red-hat-storage odf-console pull 506 0 None open Bug 2114501: [release-4.12-compatibility] add number increment input for sync interval 2022-10-19 09:25:21 UTC

Comment 3 Mudit Agarwal 2022-08-03 05:37:34 UTC 
I am not convinced this as a blocker for a tech preview feature.
We can educate a tech preview user to be more cautious while passing these arguments.

Karthick, can we reduce the severity and move it out to 4.12?
Comment 4 gowtham 2022-08-03 05:52:58 UTC 
This is a very minor issue, While displaying the DRPolicy list page it will show as a Sync, but in All DR and MirrorPeer CR, it won't mark as sync. It is not a blocker, just a display issue.
Comment 5 Mudit Agarwal 2022-08-03 08:40:04 UTC 
Thanks Gowtham, moving this out of 4.11
Comment 8 Mudit Agarwal 2022-08-03 10:25:13 UTC 
If this is not a TP blokcer, it will not be fixed in a z-stream
Comment 10 Mudit Agarwal 2022-08-03 13:47:45 UTC 
If it is just a display issue I don't think it is any kind of blocker. Please justify the blocker? flag, it can be marked as a known issue but definitely not a blocker
Comment 12 Mudit Agarwal 2022-08-04 07:16:06 UTC 
Adding it as a known issue, Gowtham please fill the doc text.
Comment 13 Chandan 2022-10-11 07:17:49 UTC 
Created attachment 1917218 [details]
UX Mockup

UX recommendation for the following bug/issue.
Comment 30 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-12-08 04:29:50 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.