Bug 2134200 - Please branch and build python-re-assert in epel9
Summary: Please branch and build python-re-assert in epel9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-re-assert
Version: epel9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: chedi toueiti
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2134229
Blocks: 2032554
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-10-12 18:32 UTC by Ben Beasley
Modified: 2022-12-12 01:43 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: python-re-assert-1.1.0-11.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-12-12 01:43:54 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ben Beasley 2022-10-12 18:32:30 UTC
Please branch and build python-re-assert in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain python-re-assert in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS music);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-re-assert/adduser

The python-re-assert package is required for some of the tests for python-aiohttp. The current Rawhide spec file appears to build for EPEL9 without any changes.

Comment 1 chedi toueiti 2022-10-12 19:30:33 UTC
I'm on it:

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/48168

I'm adding you as well, as I'm the sole maintainer of this package.

Comment 2 Ben Beasley 2022-10-12 20:42:26 UTC
Awesome; thanks!

Comment 3 Ben Beasley 2022-10-12 20:52:14 UTC
This needs python-regex. It’s still using the “old” Python guidelines and macros, so I didn’t notice the missing runtime dependency. I’ll file another bug for python-regex…

Comment 4 chedi toueiti 2022-10-12 21:20:21 UTC
You beat me to it.

You surely know it, but just in case you don't, building the packages using

```
fedpkg mockbuild -- --postinstall
```

will force it installation in the mocked environment and catching any mlissing dependencies.

Comment 5 Ben Beasley 2022-10-12 21:48:45 UTC
(In reply to chedi toueiti from comment #4)
> You beat me to it.
> 
> You surely know it, but just in case you don't, building the packages using
> 
> ```
> fedpkg mockbuild -- --postinstall
> ```
> 
> will force it installation in the mocked environment and catching any
> mlissing dependencies.

Actually, that’s new to me, and extremely convenient. I’m used to doing the install check manually. Thanks!

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-12-03 18:31:26 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ff6d172c6b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ff6d172c6b

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-12-04 02:36:30 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ff6d172c6b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ff6d172c6b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-12-12 01:43:54 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ff6d172c6b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.