Bug 214589 - gnome-games conflicts with gnome-sudoku
Summary: gnome-games conflicts with gnome-sudoku
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-games
Version: rawhide
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ray Strode [halfline]
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-11-08 15:19 UTC by Paul Dickson
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-11-08 19:41:48 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Paul Dickson 2006-11-08 15:19:58 UTC
Description of problem:
It seems that gnome-games has added gnome-sudoku, but there's no conflicts entry
in the spec file to remove the Fedora-Extras rpm.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-games-2.17.2-1.fc7

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install gnome-sudoku from Fedora-Extras-Devel
2. Update gnome-games-2.17.2
3.
  
Actual results:
Transaction Check Error:   file /usr/bin/gnome-sudoku from install of
gnome-games-2.17.2-1.fc7 conflicts with file from package gnome-sudoku-0.5.0-1.fc6


Expected results:
No errors.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Peter Gordon 2006-11-08 17:50:53 UTC
Instead of a simple Conflicts: tag, it should both Obsoletes: and Provides:
gnome-sudoku. That way it will be a transparent upgrade from gnome-sudoku in FE6
to that in gnome-games in FC7+. (Also, we should file a bug against gnome-sudoku
to mark that as dead in devel for this reason.)

Comment 2 Peter Gordon 2006-11-08 17:57:21 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Also, we should file a bug against gnome-sudoku
> to mark that as dead in devel for this reason.)

Submitted as bug #214626.



Comment 3 Matthias Clasen 2006-11-08 19:34:54 UTC
Thanks, I've added the Obsoletes/Provides now

Comment 4 Valdis Kletnieks 2006-11-10 22:48:30 UTC
Same issue, apparently, with gnuchess-5.07-10.fc6 - should that be included in
this bug, or should I open a new bug for that one?

Comment 5 Ray Strode [halfline] 2006-11-10 22:52:01 UTC
this bugs closed, if you could file another one that'd be great (so it doesn't
fall off the radar)

Comment 6 Valdis Kletnieks 2006-11-10 23:42:53 UTC
Submitted as bug #215110


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.