Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/heliodor.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/heliodor-0.1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Beryl is a combined window manager and compositing manager that runs on top of Xgl or AIGLX using OpenGL to provide effects accelerated by a 3D graphics card on the desktop. Beryl is a community-driven fork of Compiz. Heliodor is a gtk-window-decorator for use with beryl that supports using Metacity themes. Depends on beryl-core, submitted for FE-review under bug 209259.
Created attachment 141338 [details] Mock build log of heliodor 0.1.2-1 I cannot rebuild this by mockbuild on FC-devel i386.
Here's an updated build with trimmed down BR:. It builds in FC6/x86_64 mock for me, will double-check with devel builds tomorrow, if you don't beat me to it (gotta run for the night). http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/heliodor-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm
Created attachment 141451 [details] Mock build log of heliodor 0.1.2-2 Umm.. still not okay on FC-devel i386.
Okay, this is due to changes in metacity 2.17 in rawhide. The *_corner_rounded bits were renamed to *_corner_rounded_radius. Easy enough to patch around. New version builds in devel/x86_64 mock and on FC6/x86_64 for me: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/heliodor-0.1.2-3.fc6.src.rpm
Well, this time mockbuild for FC-devel i386 is okay. * Requires: metacity, control-center - Not necessary as libraries' dependency automaticall pulls them. ? /usr/share/gnome/wm-properties/ - This directory is not owned by any package, however, I don't know which package should own this. (This package requires metacity, so my thought is that this should be metacity, however, do you have any idea?) Currently, my system has the following files under /usr/share/gnome/wm-properties/: ------------------------------------------ beryl.desktop (by heliodor-0.1.2-3.fc7) compiz.desktop (by compiz-0.3.2-2.fc7) metacity.desktop (by metacity-2.17.2-1.fc7) ------------------------------------------ ? For license: - lib/beryl-window-manager.c seems to be "free" (not GPL however less strict than GPL) - src/main.c says this is LGPL (not GPL) (why?) - and there is a copy license that this is GPL..... Well, however, I trust the document license and I assume that this package is licensed under GPL for now. Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------- This packag (beliodor) is APPROVED by me.
Thanks much! I've removed the Reqs: for the build I'll import, and the directory ownership problem has been filed against metacity as bug 216514.