Bug 2183700 - Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language
Summary: Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://nim-lang.org/
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-04-01 08:54 UTC by Felix Wang
Modified: 2023-11-28 07:35 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5735135 to 5735583 (1.82 KB, patch)
2023-04-01 16:51 UTC, Jakub Kadlčík
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5735583 to 5758534 (957 bytes, patch)
2023-04-08 05:15 UTC, Jakub Kadlčík
no flags Details | Diff

Description Felix Wang 2023-04-01 08:54:13 UTC
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/topazus/test/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05733050-nim/nim.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/topazus/test/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05733050-nim/nim-1.6.10-1.fc39.src.rpm

Description:
Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines
successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its
design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of
priority).

Fedora Account System Username: topazus

Comment 1 Jakub Kadlčík 2023-04-01 09:32:48 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5735135
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2183700-nim/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05735135-nim/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Jakub Kadlčík 2023-04-01 16:51:10 UTC
Created attachment 1955094 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5735135 to 5735583

Comment 4 Jakub Kadlčík 2023-04-01 16:51:13 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5735583
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2183700-nim/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05735583-nim/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Jakub Kadlčík 2023-04-08 05:15:53 UTC
Created attachment 1956359 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5735583 to 5758534

Comment 7 Jakub Kadlčík 2023-04-08 05:15:55 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5758534
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2183700-nim/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05758534-nim/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 8 dongdigua 2023-04-29 07:50:28 UTC
好耶! great!
I also want nim to be back in Fedora again, thank you.
btw, I'm unretiring nvi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183721

Comment 9 Felix Wang 2023-05-04 03:25:33 UTC
(In reply to dongdigua from comment #8)
> 好耶! great!
> I also want nim to be back in Fedora again, thank you.
> btw, I'm unretiring nvi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183721

Thanks. As for the nvi unretirement, I have the similar question with Harald Reindl, since it was little commit history over the last two years, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183721#c2

Comment 10 Jens Petersen 2023-11-28 07:33:30 UTC
I feel you should base off the old retired package (spec file) please,
unless there is a good/strong reason not to do that.
Then you could also open a PR in pagure for the package unretirement as part of this review.
I think that would make it easier to review and approve.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nim

Latest upstream version is now 2.0, though 1.6.16 might be okay too for now?

Comment 11 Jens Petersen 2023-11-28 07:35:43 UTC
Well maybe not PR, but rather a personal pagure fork anyway.

(In practice rel-eng will revert the last commit when un-retiring the package)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.