Bug 2205 - rh5.9.7 installer - why not install on ls120?
rh5.9.7 installer - why not install on ls120?
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: installer (Show other bugs)
6.0
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Matt Wilson
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 1999-04-15 17:40 EDT by icecep
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-09-24 23:46:26 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description icecep 1999-04-15 17:40:35 EDT
hi

could you please re-enable the possibility to install to
ls120 disk4s ? (i compiled a kernel with ide-floppy support
and commented 1 line in your installer code and succeeded)

an additional change has to be made with the lilo-installer

you need the parameters
disk /dev/hdc (if the ls120 is secondary master)
   bios 0x00

in lilo.conf

and you have to install the stuff to /dev/hdc (not hdc1) ..

2) please let someone chose to dis/enable ALL packages (at
least in expert mode) to reduce the minimal install size of
redhat

see ya.
Comment 1 David Lawrence 1999-05-07 14:15:59 EDT
Thank you for the suggestions. It has been assigned to a developer for
further review.
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 1999-09-24 23:46:59 EDT
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 106 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.