Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.4-1.src.rpm Description: LabPlot is for scientific 2D and 3D data and function plotting. The various display and analysis functions are explained in the handbook (KDE help center). LabPlot also provides a component for easily viewing the project files in Konqueror.
I am not sponsored, it is a prereview. I think You should be consistently using the macro %{name} in %files in spec-file. For example in %files devel %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so %{_libdir}/libLabPlotnetCDF.so I think it will be better if it is: %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so %{_libdir}/lib%{name}netCDF.so Rebuild with mock is correct. Rpmlint: SRPM - NULL - ok RPM(base): W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/br/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/br/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pl/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/pl/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ It is not ok. RPM(devel) - NULL - ok You should fix it.
A new upstream stable version has been released. Ill make those changes in the upcoming days.
Updated Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-1.src.rpm changelog - New stable release 1.5.1.5 - Fixed symlink-should-be-relative rpmlint issues - Removed numerous entries on kmenu - Added examples in a new -doc package - Building pdf handbook for different languages - Breaking down -doc package for different languages
To use system-wide qwtplot3d, pass --enable-system-qwtplot3d to configure and export QWT3D_PATH=/usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib. For netcdf, please see bug #221022.
I have noticed that you have enabled libundo. I will post a review request soonish. I also have a spec for liborigin, so lemme know if you get LabPlot to use system-wide one.
Also add audiofile-devel to BuildRequires.
Updated Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-2.src.rpm Changelog - 1.5.1.5-2 - Added audiofile-devel, qwtplot3d-devel, ocaml and netcdf-devel as BR - using qwtplot3d and netcdf system wide #221022 - Fixed qt-qsa headers
Build fails for me in mock with: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/libLabPlotnetCDF.so.3* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/libLabPlotqwtplot3d.so.0* File not found: /var/tmp/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/libLabPlotnetCDF.so File not found: /var/tmp/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/libLabPlotqwtplot3d.so
A few comments: 1. Requires: kdelibs ImageMagick-c++ gsl fftw aren't required, rpm will(should!) pick these up automatically, you should remove these manual dependencies. 2. subpkgs, particularly -devel, should Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{devel} 3. configure \ %ifarch x86_64 sparc64 ppc64 amd64 --enable-libsuffix=64 \ --with-qt-libraries=$QTDIR/lib \ %endif shouldn't be required. qt packaging properly sets QTLIB env variable for awhile now. 4. instead of sed -i -e \ s'|Categories=Qt;KDE;Education;Science;Physics;Math;|Categories=Science;|' \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/kde/%{name}.desktop It's preferable to use desktop-file-install --remove-category="..." (and I'd argue you shouldn't be removing "Qt;KDE;Education" categories 5. items under %{_datadir}/apps/%{name}/handbook imo, should be marked %doc 6. These are not required: %post devel -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun devel -p /sbin/ldconfig and -devel's Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig
(In reply to comment #9) > 2. subpkgs, particularly -devel, should > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{devel} Hmm how can a %{name}-%{version}-%{devel} be "autodependent" ? %{name}-%{version}-%{devel} depends on %{name}-%{version}-%{devel} doesn't make sense. > 4. instead of > sed -i -e \ > s'|Categories=Qt;KDE;Education;Science;Physics;Math;|Categories=Science;|' \ > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/kde/%{name}.desktop > It's preferable to use > desktop-file-install --remove-category="..." > (and I'd argue you shouldn't be removing "Qt;KDE;Education" categories Labplot will be part of the Scientific Tools at Fedora at the same time a KDE package. Since Labplot will be installed at kmenu>Edutainement>Mathematics and other scientific tools such as Qalculate, the next release of the geda packages, kicad and xcircuit are being installed at kmenu>Science&Math, that is why I prefer that important tool, Labplot, to be installed at Science&Math instead of having multiple copies/items of Labplot in the kmenu (which makes the kde menu huge)
Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.4-3.src.rpm
Build for me for FC6 in mock. Looks like it can't find the following: checking for main in -lkexidb... no -> this is in koffice-devel Don't know what functionality this would provide... Also can't find: checking for texvc... no -> This is part of mediawiki. LabPlot uses it's own included version. Not sure if this is a big deal or not. checking cdfrev.h usability... no checking cdfrev.h presence... no checking for cdfrev.h... no checking for main in -lcdf... no But this doesn't seem to be in Extras. Again, no idea what this affects, just pointing it out. Finally: cephes : using included cephes library. but this isn't packaged seperately in FE.
The original cephes-math library, http://www.moshier.net/cephes-math-38.tar.gz/ From readme file: "Some software in this archive may be from the book _Methods and Programs for Mathematical Functions_ (Prentice-Hall, 1989) or from the Cephes Mathematical Library, a commercial product. In either event, it is copyrighted by the author. What you see here may be used freely but it comes with no support or guarantee." From the INSTALL file: "Precompiled libraries and programs are supplied here for ix86-linux." I don't think that the original cephes-math library is compatible with Fedora policies
Looking forward to use liborigin system wide.
The URL in #11 gives a 404
Are you still have the 404 error ?
Yes
(In reply to comment #11) > Updated: > Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec > SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.4-3.src.rpm SRPM should be: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-3.src.rpm Perhaps just a typo.
(In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Updated: > > Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec > > SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.4-3.src.rpm > > SRPM should be: > http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-3.src.rpm > Perhaps just a typo. Yes it should , sorry however : this is wrong: --remove-category="KDE" \ --remove-category="Qt" \ --remove-category="Physics" \ --remove-category="Education" \ --remove-category="Math" \ I'll fix it.
Created attachment 147298 [details] failed build log failed build log
the supplied liborigin from LabPlot is no more built, but however it calls for liborigin.la. liborigin.la isn't supplied by the liborigin that recently got approved. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223598 make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../liborigin/liborigin.la', needed by `LabPlot'. Stop. make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/BUILD/LabPlot-1.5.1.5/src'
Oddly enough, it built fine on my FC rawhide x86 box in and out of mock. Do you want to fix the problems and I can review it?
Updated Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-4.src.rpm
Ping ?
following comment #24, I'm removing Paul Johnson from the reviewer list. Feel free to tqke over the reviewer :)
Well, actually I have not read the previous discussion in this bug, so some of them I write below may be already addressed previously... For 1.5.1.5-4: A. Spec file description * SourceURL - Please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Dependency for main package - Usually dependency for main package should be release number specific. * Conditional dependency -------------------------------------------------------- # Use of --enable-final: The gsl version 1.6 has a bug which may cause problems. -------------------------------------------------------- - While I don't know what --enable-final does, however rawhide gsl is gsl-1.8-3.fc7. Please check if this feature can be enabled. By the way, configure checkes gsl version....... -------------------------------------------------------- gsl : yes gsl-devel : yes gsl >= 1.4 : yes gsl >= 1.6 : yes gsl >= 1.7 : yes -------------------------------------------------------- B. File entry * French documentation files - While you split br, de, ... language documentation files into seperate subpackages, why don't you split French documents? * Doc rpms dependency - Currently, this is corrupted. Also for _installed_ rpms, I get the following rpmlint. -------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1@localhost ~]$ rpmlint LabPlot-doc-it W: LabPlot-doc-it dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics [tasaka1@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep LabPlot | sort LabPlot-1.5.1.5-4.fc7 LabPlot-devel-1.5.1.5-4.fc7 LabPlot-doc-it-1.5.1.5-4.fc7 -------------------------------------------------------- B. rpmlint * Attached (currently only 3 rpms above are installed). Summary: - There are many files withWindows style end-of-line encoding. NOTE: there are no complaint about this on main package, however allmost all files under /usr/share/apps/LabPlot/colormaps in main package also have Windows-like end-of-file encodings so they should be fixed. - Symlinks are corrupted (see above) - For undefined-non-weak-symbol: * First of all, what is the use of -devel package? There are no header files in -devel package, so generally other applications has no way to know how to link against libLabPlot.so or libLabPlotcephes.so. Is this -devel package really useful? * If the libraries libLabPlot.so or libLabPlotcephes.so are supposed to be linked from other packages, then these undefined-non-weak-symbols are the BLOCKER for this review request because leaving these symbols leads linkage for these libraries to failure. C. File check * Non-UTF8 documentation - Some of the documents installed are not encoded in UTF-8. -------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-1.5.1.5/BUGS: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-1.5.1.5/ChangeLog: ISO-8859 Java program text /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-1.5.1.5/TODO: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-1.5.1.5/WISHLIST: ISO-8859 English text --------------------------------------------------------
Created attachment 152278 [details] rpmlint log for LabPlot 1.5.1.5-4
(In reply to comment #21) > the supplied liborigin from LabPlot is no more built, but however it calls for > liborigin.la. > > liborigin.la isn't supplied by the liborigin that recently got approved. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223598 IMO you should apply a patch against LabPlot to use system-wide liborigin.
Created attachment 152314 [details] LabPlot.spec with some fixes added LabPlot.spec with - Use system liborigin library - Shut up undefined non-weak symbols - Fix end-of-line encodings of [Mm]ap file - Change the encoding of a part of documents - Require doc for doc-?? subpackage NOTE that not all of the issues I pointed out are fixed. Please check the spec file attached, and _modify_ it. Now rpmlint for binary rpms are ---------------------------------------------- W: LabPlot incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.5.1.5-4 1.5.1.5-4.2.fc7 W: LabPlot-devel no-documentation W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/qwt.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/rydberg.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/fit.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/analysis.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/axeslabel.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc-br dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/br/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics W: LabPlot-doc-de dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics W: LabPlot-doc-it dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics W: LabPlot-doc-nl dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics W: LabPlot-doc-pl dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pl/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics W: LabPlot-doc-sv dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics -------------------------------------------------- For installed: -------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1@localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot W: LabPlot incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.5.1.5-4 1.5.1.5-4.2.fc7 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/liblcms.so.1 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /lib/libz.so.1 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libWand.so.10 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /lib/libpthread.so.0 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1 [tasaka1@localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot-devel W: LabPlot-devel no-documentation [tasaka1@localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot-doc-it [tasaka1@localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot-doc W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/qwt.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/rydberg.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/fit.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/analysis.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/axeslabel.lpl.gz ----------------------------------------------- ldd says: [tasaka1@localhost i386]$ ldd -r /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so | grep liborigin liborigin.so.0 => /usr/lib/liborigin.so.0 (0x0098b000)
(In reply to comment #26) > * Conditional dependency > -------------------------------------------------------- > # Use of --enable-final: The gsl version 1.6 has a bug which may cause problems. > -------------------------------------------------------- > - While I don't know what --enable-final does, however rawhide > gsl is gsl-1.8-3.fc7. Please check if this feature can be enabled. > > By the way, configure checkes gsl version....... > -------------------------------------------------------- > gsl : yes > gsl-devel : yes > gsl >= 1.4 : yes > gsl >= 1.6 : yes > gsl >= 1.7 : yes > -------------------------------------------------------- It is still broken. (In reply to comment #29) > [tasaka1@localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot > W: LabPlot incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.5.1.5-4 1.5.1.5-4.2.fc7 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/liblcms.so.1 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /lib/libz.so.1 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libWand.so.10 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /lib/libpthread.so.0 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1 It can be ignored.
(In reply to comment #30) > > (In reply to comment #29) > > [tasaka1@localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot > > W: LabPlot incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.5.1.5-4 1.5.1.5-4.2.fc7 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/liblcms.so.1 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 > > It can be ignored. Yes. Anyway, please check my spec file and fix it. Especially, * it seems for me that -devel package is not useful because -devel package does not contain any header files * I don't understand why you don't split -fr documents
Updated Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-5.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #31) > * I don't understand why you don't split -fr documents I've done it.
Created attachment 152548 [details] mock build log of LabPlot-1.5.1.5-5 on FC-devel i386 mockbuild fails on FC-devel i386 (at least due to non-checked existing files). I just tried to rebuild -5, however: * Are the .so symlink needed?
ping?
Updated Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec
Please change release number correctly... Also please also upload a new srpm.
Well, please change release number properly. Other things are okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (LabPlot) is APPROVED by me -----------------------------------------------------
Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.4-6.src.rpm
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: LabPlot Short Description: Data Analysis and Visualization Owners: cgoorah.au Branches: FC-6
It fails on PPC F7 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/32607-LabPlot-1.5.1.5-6.fc7/ppc/build.log
I don't know well about ocaml, however from I tried on FC-devel i386, the line -------------------------------------- ocamlc -c tex.mli -------------------------------------- seems to fail when -------------------------------------- ocamlc -c render_info.mli -------------------------------------- is not finished. So... would you try to disable parallel make support?
It works when parallel make for ppc arch is disabled. thanks Mamoru