Bug 2213308 - Review Request: golang-github-hebcal-gematriya - Go implementation of gematriya
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-hebcal-gematriya - Go implementation of gematriya
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Link Dupont
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2213321 2213311
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-06-07 18:37 UTC by Mark E. Fuller
Modified: 2023-06-11 06:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-11 06:54:59 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
link: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Link Dupont 2023-06-08 17:28:52 UTC
rpmlint did throw a summary-to-long error. I'll approve anyway, but it might be worth reducing the length of the summary.

> golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel.noarch: E: summary-too-long Simple Go implementation of gematriya, a system of writing numbers as Hebrew letters

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
     upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD
     2-Clause License". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/link/2213308-golang-github-hebcal-
     gematriya/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel-1.0.1-1.fc39.noarch.rpm
          golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-1.0.1-1.fc39.src.rpm
=================================================================== rpmlint session starts ==================================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp5nalo52e')]
checks: 31, packages: 2

golang-github-hebcal-gematriya.src: E: summary-too-long Simple Go implementation of gematriya, a system of writing numbers as Hebrew letters
golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel.noarch: E: summary-too-long Simple Go implementation of gematriya, a system of writing numbers as Hebrew letters
golang-github-hebcal-gematriya.spec: W: no-%build-section
golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/hebcal/gematriya/.goipath
golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/hebcal/gematriya/README.md /usr/share/doc/golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel/README.md
==================================== 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings, 2 badness; has taken 0.4 s ===================================




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 1

golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel.noarch: E: summary-too-long Simple Go implementation of gematriya, a system of writing numbers as Hebrew letters
golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/hebcal/gematriya/.goipath
golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/hebcal/gematriya/README.md /usr/share/doc/golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel/README.md
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings, 1 badness; has taken 0.0 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/hebcal/gematriya/archive/v1.0.1/gematriya-1.0.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 895a94d7d6bd107ef2456cb02dae899d28577e73174134789ff3bdd93308fa2a
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 895a94d7d6bd107ef2456cb02dae899d28577e73174134789ff3bdd93308fa2a


Requires
--------
golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    go-filesystem



Provides
--------
golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel:
    golang(github.com/hebcal/gematriya)
    golang-github-hebcal-gematriya-devel
    golang-ipath(github.com/hebcal/gematriya)



Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2213308
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: PHP, Haskell, C/C++, R, fonts, SugarActivity, Java, Python, Perl, Ocaml
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comment 2 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-06-11 06:37:16 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-hebcal-gematriya

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2023-06-11 06:51:54 UTC
FEDORA-2023-cc9f068f1e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-cc9f068f1e

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2023-06-11 06:54:59 UTC
FEDORA-2023-cc9f068f1e has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.