Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-intbitset.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-intbitset-3.0.2-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: The intbitset library provides a set implementation to store sorted unsigned integers either 32-bits integers (between 0 and 2**31 - 1 or intbitset.__maxelem__) or an infinite range with fast set operations implemented via bit vectors in a Python C extension for speed and reduced memory usage. The inbitset class emulates the Python built-in set class interface with some additional specific methods such as its own fast dump and load marshalling functions. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo To build it against the dependencies, use the following COPR in your rawhide mock.cfg: [copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:eclipseo:scancode-toolkit] name=Copr repo for scancode-toolkit owned by eclipseo baseurl=https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eclipseo/scancode-toolkit/fedora-rawhide-/ type=rpm-md skip_if_unavailable=True gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eclipseo/scancode-toolkit/pubkey.gpg repo_gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 enabled_metadata=1
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file license.rst.txt is not marked as %license See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 3", "GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "MIT License". 11 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/FedoraPackaging/reviews/python-intbitset/2235067-python- intbitset/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 16490 bytes in 3 files. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3-intbitset [ ]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-intbitset-3.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm python-intbitset-doc-3.0.2-1.fc38.noarch.rpm python-intbitset-debugsource-3.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm python-intbitset-3.0.2-1.fc38.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpo7y6soeo')] checks: 31, packages: 4 python-intbitset-doc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/python-intbitset-doc/html/_sources/license.rst.txt python3-intbitset.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/intbitset_helper.py python3-intbitset.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/intbitset_version.py 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings, 3 badness; has taken 5.7 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 3 python-intbitset-doc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/python-intbitset-doc/html/_sources/license.rst.txt python3-intbitset.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/intbitset_helper.py python3-intbitset.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/intbitset_version.py 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings, 3 badness; has taken 1.4 s Unversioned so-files -------------------- python3-intbitset: /usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/intbitset.cpython-311-x86_64-linux-gnu.so Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/inveniosoftware-contrib/intbitset/archive/v3.0.2/intbitset-3.0.2.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d08c2e9d8d17dc8bbe2d76e79e08fc6977585c83d4e07bf8a9e70673f196c993 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d08c2e9d8d17dc8bbe2d76e79e08fc6977585c83d4e07bf8a9e70673f196c993 Requires -------- python3-intbitset (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH) python-intbitset-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python-intbitset-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- python3-intbitset: python-intbitset python3-intbitset python3-intbitset(x86-64) python3.11-intbitset python3.11dist(intbitset) python3dist(intbitset) python-intbitset-doc: python-intbitset-doc python-intbitset-debugsource: python-intbitset-debugsource python-intbitset-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2235067 -m fedora-38-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-38-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Python, Generic, C/C++ Disabled plugins: PHP, Ruby, Java, fonts, Haskell, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, R Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH Comments: a) Cython should be run in the build section, not in the prep section b) Remove pregenerated c file in the prep section, this is src/intbitset.c c) dist-info folder contains README.rst, AUTHORS.rst and CHANGELOG.rst so do not need to mark these as documentation files d) rpm -qL python3-intbitset-3.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm gives: /usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/intbitset-3.0.2.dist-info/AUTHORS.rst /usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/intbitset-3.0.2.dist-info/CHANGELOG.rst /usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/intbitset-3.0.2.dist-info/LICENSE /usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/intbitset-3.0.2.dist-info/README.rst /usr/share/licenses/python3-intbitset/LICENSE so no need to mark the LICENSE file as %license because the one in dist-info has the correct metadata. e) Doc package has bundled js-jquery and js-underscore. Please indicate this in the spec file. f) Does not build on s390x: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=106956624
> e) Doc package has bundled js-jquery and js-underscore. Please indicate this in the spec file. Can´t find that at all. Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-intbitset.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-intbitset-3.0.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Thanks for the review!
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528289 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235067-python-intbitset/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528289-python-intbitset/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
- Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. Note: python3-cython0.29 is deprecated, you must not depend on it. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/deprecating-packages/ Can: BuildRequires: python3-Cython be replaced by: BuildRequires: cython See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Cython
Thanks, updated: Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-intbitset.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-intbitset-3.0.2-1.fc39.src.rpm
Created attachment 1995169 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 6528289 to 6557798
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6557798 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235067-python-intbitset/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06557798-python-intbitset/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. Note: python3-cython0.29 is deprecated, you must not depend on it. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/deprecating-packages/ - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file license.rst.txt is not marked as %license See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [-]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required. Note: Sources not installed [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 3", "GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "MIT License". 11 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/fedora/2235067-python-intbitset/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [-]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep Note: Cannot find any build in BUILD directory (--prebuilt option?) [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [-]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3-intbitset [ ]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-intbitset-3.0.2-1.fc40.aarch64.rpm python-intbitset-doc-3.0.2-1.fc40.noarch.rpm python-intbitset-debugsource-3.0.2-1.fc40.aarch64.rpm python-intbitset-3.0.2-1.fc40.src.rpm ======================================= rpmlint session starts ======================================= rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp47ikoy__')] checks: 31, packages: 4 python3-intbitset.aarch64: W: no-documentation python-intbitset-doc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/python-intbitset-doc/html/_sources/license.rst.txt python3-intbitset.aarch64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/intbitset_helper.py python3-intbitset.aarch64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/intbitset_version.py ======== 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings, 3 badness; has taken 0.3 s ======== Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 3 python3-intbitset.aarch64: W: no-documentation python3-intbitset.aarch64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/intbitset_helper.py python3-intbitset.aarch64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/intbitset_version.py python-intbitset-doc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/python-intbitset-doc/html/_sources/license.rst.txt 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings, 3 badness; has taken 0.2 s Unversioned so-files -------------------- python3-intbitset: /usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/intbitset.cpython-312-aarch64-linux-gnu.so Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/inveniosoftware-contrib/intbitset/archive/v3.0.2/intbitset-3.0.2.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d08c2e9d8d17dc8bbe2d76e79e08fc6977585c83d4e07bf8a9e70673f196c993 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d08c2e9d8d17dc8bbe2d76e79e08fc6977585c83d4e07bf8a9e70673f196c993 Requires -------- python3-intbitset (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ld-linux-aarch64.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH) python-intbitset-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python-intbitset-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- python3-intbitset: python-intbitset python3-intbitset python3-intbitset(aarch-64) python3.12-intbitset python3.12dist(intbitset) python3dist(intbitset) python-intbitset-doc: python-intbitset-doc python-intbitset-debugsource: python-intbitset-debugsource python-intbitset-debugsource(aarch-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2235067 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-aarch64 Active plugins: C/C++, Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Ocaml, PHP, Perl, SugarActivity, fonts, Java, Haskell, R Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH Comments: a) searchtools.js and most other javascript files in the documentation package are under BSD license b) Cython warning happens with every Cython package in Fedora. Seems like a bug in Fedora-review, perhaps revert to BuildRequires: Cython as this is the most update one https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Cython
this was fixed this week-end but apparently I didn't rsync the changes correctly: Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-intbitset.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-intbitset-3.0.2-1.fc39.src.rpm We have: %package -n python-%{pypi_name}-doc Summary: Documentation for python-%{pypi_name} # BSD-2-Clause: Sphinx javascript # MIT: jquery License: LGPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-2-Clause AND MIT BuildArch: noarch Requires: python3-%{pypi_name} = %{?epoch:%{epoch}:}%{version}-%{release} Provides: bundled(js-sphinx_javascript_frameworks_compat) Provides: bundled(js-doctools) Provides: bundled(js-jquery) Provides: bundled(js-language_data) Provides: bundled(js-searchtools) And BuildRequires: Cython BuildRequires: cython
Created attachment 1995210 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 6557798 to 6558507
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6558507 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235067-python-intbitset/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06558507-python-intbitset/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Approved.
Thanks again!
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-intbitset
Package is now built for all stable Fedoras. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=38760