Bug 2251690 (F40Serverbootx86_64Oversize) - Fedora 40: Server boot x86_64 image exceeds maximum size
Summary: Fedora 40: Server boot x86_64 image exceeds maximum size
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: F40Serverbootx86_64Oversize
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: distribution
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Aoife Moloney
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: AcceptedBlocker
Depends On:
Blocks: FedoraOversizeTracker BetaBlocker, F40BetaBlocker F40FinalBlocker, FinalBlocker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-11-27 08:49 UTC by Fedora QA Tools SIG
Modified: 2024-01-30 18:44 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-01-30 18:44:35 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fedora QA Tools SIG 2023-11-27 08:49:29 UTC
Server boot x86_64 image https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20231127.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20231127.n.0.iso from compose Fedora-Rawhide-20231127.n.0 is 808667136 bytes, exceeding the maximum size 734003200. Canonical maximum sizes can be found at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/f40/spins/ and https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/f40/blocking/ . This check is run by the 'relval' tool, which has its own list of maximum sizes derived from those pages. If the maximum size used for this comparison is wrong, please add a comment and file a bug against relval at https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relval/issues and it will be corrected. If you believe the canonical maximum size for an image should be changed, please follow the appropriate process before filing a relval bug.

Comment 1 Adam Williamson 2023-11-28 00:55:10 UTC
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251688#c1 .

Comment 2 Fedora QA Tools SIG 2023-11-30 09:02:11 UTC
Server boot x86_64 image https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20231130.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20231130.n.0.iso from compose Fedora-Rawhide-20231130.n.0 is 762101760 bytes, exceeding the maximum size 734003200.

Comment 3 Adam Williamson 2023-12-02 00:51:53 UTC
Per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Automatic_blockers , this is an automatic blocker. Marking accepted.

Comment 4 Fedora QA Tools SIG 2023-12-06 08:36:10 UTC
Server boot x86_64 image https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20231206.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20231206.n.0.iso from compose Fedora-Rawhide-20231206.n.0 is 761677824 bytes, exceeding the maximum size 734003200.

Comment 5 Fedora QA Tools SIG 2023-12-13 08:52:31 UTC
Server boot x86_64 image https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20231213.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20231213.n.0.iso from compose Fedora-Rawhide-20231213.n.0 is 761999360 bytes, exceeding the maximum size 734003200.

Comment 6 Fedora QA Tools SIG 2023-12-16 08:29:17 UTC
Server boot x86_64 image https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20231216.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20231216.n.0.iso from compose Fedora-Rawhide-20231216.n.0 is 768581632 bytes, exceeding the maximum size 734003200.

Comment 7 Fedora QA Tools SIG 2023-12-20 09:47:14 UTC
Server boot x86_64 image https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20231220.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20231220.n.0.iso from compose Fedora-Rawhide-20231220.n.0 is 769046528 bytes, exceeding the maximum size 734003200.

Comment 8 Fedora QA Tools SIG 2023-12-23 10:23:07 UTC
Server boot x86_64 image https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20231223.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20231223.n.0.iso from compose Fedora-Rawhide-20231223.n.0 is 769130496 bytes, exceeding the maximum size 734003200.

Comment 9 Fedora QA Tools SIG 2024-01-07 09:21:54 UTC
Server boot x86_64 image https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20240107.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20240107.n.0.iso from compose Fedora-Rawhide-20240107.n.0 is 770193408 bytes, exceeding the maximum size 734003200.

Comment 10 Fedora QA Tools SIG 2024-01-18 01:25:14 UTC
Server boot x86_64 image https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20240117.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20240117.n.0.iso from compose Fedora-Rawhide-20240117.n.0 is 779583488 bytes, exceeding the maximum size 734003200.

Comment 11 Fedora QA Tools SIG 2024-01-21 10:58:59 UTC
Server boot x86_64 image https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20240121.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20240121.n.0.iso from compose Fedora-Rawhide-20240121.n.0 is 781344768 bytes, exceeding the maximum size 734003200.

Comment 12 Adam Williamson 2024-01-22 18:08:37 UTC
This has been under discussion at https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3122 . I have now made a recommendation to FESCo in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3122#comment-892727 and proposed it as a PR in https://pagure.io/fedora-pgm/pgm_docs/pull-request/64 .

Comment 13 Adam Williamson 2024-01-30 00:13:01 UTC
FESCo approved the change in max size to 1 GB, so this image is no longer oversize. https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3122#comment-893766

Comment 14 Fedora QA Tools SIG 2024-01-30 08:38:53 UTC
Server boot x86_64 image https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20240130.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20240130.n.0.iso from compose Fedora-Rawhide-20240130.n.0 is 777334784 bytes, exceeding the maximum size 734003200.

Comment 15 Adam Williamson 2024-01-30 18:44:35 UTC
sorry, I messed up updating the size list the script uses. i've fixed this now, hopefully it won't get re-opened again.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.