Bug 225259 - Merge Review: aspell-br
Summary: Merge Review: aspell-br
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Parag AN(पराग)
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-01-29 21:02 UTC by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-04-11 03:21:30 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
panemade: fedora-review+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-29 21:02:46 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: aspell-br


Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-03-28 04:09:43 UTC
build.log showed me
word-list-compress d < br.cwl | aspell  --lang=br create master ./br.rws
Warning: The word "a-zre-'mañ" is invalid. The character '-' (U+2D) must be
followed by an alphabetic character. Skipping word.
Warning: The word "pont-'n-abad" is invalid. The character '-' (U+2D) must be
followed by an alphabetic character. Skipping word.

Can you fix this?
Can you remove option DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT from ./configure and update SPEC?

Comment 2 Ivana Varekova 2007-03-28 17:59:04 UTC
DESTDIR option was removed - but there is no need to fix the above warning
messages - they does not mean any harm. 

Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-03-29 03:54:52 UTC
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
- rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and RPM.
  But following messages are ignorable
  E: aspell-br no-binary
  E: aspell-br only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
  E: aspell-br configure-without-libdir-spec
+ SPEC file contains explanation about above warnings.
+ source files match upstream.
800c7a28e09bd7734d1501cb7a91ad8f  aspell-br-0.50-2.tar.bz2
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Requires: aspell >= 12:0.60
+ Provides: aspell-br = 50:0.50-8.fc7
+ Not a GUI APP.


Comment 4 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-04-11 03:21:30 UTC
As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.