Bug 225990 - Merge Review: libbonoboui
Summary: Merge Review: libbonoboui
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bill Nottingham
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-01-31 19:19 UTC by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2014-03-17 03:05 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-07-10 02:49:38 UTC
Type: ---
notting: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
patch! (2.61 KB, patch)
2010-07-09 03:45 UTC, Bill Nottingham
no flags Details | Diff

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 19:19:13 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: libbonoboui

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libbonoboui/
Initial Owner: rstrode@redhat.com

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2010-07-09 03:43:59 UTC
MUST items:
- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK
- Spec file matches base package name. - OK
- Spec has consistent macro usage. - OK 
- Meets Packaging Guidelines. ***

Could use %{?_smp_mflags}.

- License - LGPLv2+ (lib), GPLv2+ (browser)
- License field in spec matches - ***

Technically, it's the -devel package that has the GPLv2+ bits.

- License file included in package - ***

COPYING.LIB not included.

- Spec in American English - OK
- Spec is legible. - OK
- Sources match upstream md5sum:

0be51ee3069a2ef21d98561ee28036dd263ac08b401776fe9164e084825ffd84  libbonoboui-2.24.3.tar.bz2

OK

- Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A
- BuildRequires correct - ***

automake/autoconf aren't required in the kernel version (it's not patched.)

libXt-devel is certainly extraneous.

Some of the versions in the spec don't quite match the configure script, but... whatever.

- Spec handles locales/find_lang - OK
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK
- Package has a correct %clean section. - OK
- Package is code or permissible content. - OK
- Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK

- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - OK
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - OK
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig  -OK
- .so files in -devel subpackage.  - OK
- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}  - OK
- .la files are removed. - OK

- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file - ***

Browser doesn't have one. Don't think it needs it.

- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK
- Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK
- Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK
- No rpmlint output.

src rpm:
libbonoboui.src: W: no-buildroot-tag

Ignorable, not needed.

libbonoboui:
libbonoboui.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libglade/2.0/libbonobo.so ['/usr/lib64']

libbonoboui.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libbonoboui-2.24.3/AUTHORS


libbonoboui-devel:
libbonoboui-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/bonobo-browser ['/usr/lib64']
libbonoboui-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/test-moniker ['/usr/lib64']
libbonoboui-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/bonobo-2.0/samples/bonobo-sample-controls-2 ['/usr/lib64']
libbonoboui-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary test-moniker
libbonoboui-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bonobo-browser

Warnings are ignorable. rpath should probably be fixed. AUTHORS can be dropped.

- final provides and requires are sane:

Nothing fishy here.

SHOULD Items:

- Should build in mock. - OK
- Should build on all supported archs - OK
- Should function as described. - OK
- Should have sane scriptlets. - OK
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. - OK
- Should have dist tag - OK
- Should package latest version - OK
- check for outstanding bugs on package. - Meh. Nothing critical.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2010-07-09 03:45:08 UTC
Created attachment 430528 [details]
patch!

This fixes the issues from the review. OK to commit?

Comment 3 Matthias Clasen 2010-07-09 18:40:07 UTC
Man, be careful. 
You are going to end up libbonobo maintainer before the package is finally dead.
Just go ahead, please.

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2010-07-10 02:49:38 UTC
OK. Closing.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.